Merge from emacs-23; up to 2010-06-08T03:06:47Z!dann@ics.uci.edu.
[bpt/emacs.git] / admin / notes / bzr
1 NOTES ON COMMITTING TO EMACS'S BAZAAR REPO -*- outline -*-
2
3 * Install changes only on one branch, let them get merged elsewhere if needed.
4 In particular, install bug-fixes only on the release branch (if there
5 is one) and let them get synced to the trunk; do not install them by
6 hand on the trunk as well. E.g. if there is an active "emacs-23" branch
7 and you have a bug-fix appropriate for the next Emacs-23.x release,
8 install it only on the emacs-23 branch, not on the trunk as well.
9
10 Installing things manually into more than one branch makes merges more
11 difficult.
12
13 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-03/msg01124.html
14
15 * Backporting a bug-fix from the trunk to a branch (e.g. "emacs-23").
16 Label the commit as a backport, e.g. by starting the commit message with
17 "Backport:". This is helpful for the person merging the release branch
18 to the trunk.
19
20 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-05/msg00262.html
21
22 * Installing changes from your personal branches.
23 If your branch has only a single commit, or many different real
24 commits, it is fine to do a merge. If your branch has only a very
25 small number of "real" commits, but several "merge from trunks", it is
26 preferred that you take your branch's diff, apply it to the trunk, and
27 commit directly, not merge. This keeps the history cleaner.
28
29 In general, when working on some feature in a separate branch, it is
30 preferable not to merge from trunk until you are done with the
31 feature. Unless you really need some change that was done on the
32 trunk while you were developing on the branch, you don't really need
33 those merges; just merge once, when you are done with the feature, and
34 Bazaar will take care of the rest. Bazaar is much better in this than
35 CVS, so interim merges are unnecessary.
36
37 Or use shelves; or rebase; or do something else. See the thread for
38 yet another fun excursion into the exciting world of version control.
39
40 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2010-04/msg00086.html
41
42 * Installing changes from gnulib
43 Some of the files in Emacs are copied from gnulib. To synchronize
44 these files from the version of gnulib that you have checked out into
45 a sibling directory of your branch, type "make sync-from-gnulib"; this
46 will check out the latest version of gnulib if there is no sibling
47 directory already. It is a good idea to run "bzr status" afterwards,
48 so that if a gnulib module added a file, you can record the new file
49 using "bzr add". After synchronizing from gnulib, do a "make" in the
50 usual way.
51
52 To change the set of gnulib modules, change the GNULIB_MODULES
53 variable in the top-level Makefile.in, and then run:
54
55 ./config.status
56 make sync-from-gnulib
57 bzr status
58
59 The last command will mention files that may need to be added using
60 "bzr add". If you remove a gnulib module, or if a gnulib module
61 removes a file, then remove the corresponding files by hand.
62
63 * How to merge changes from emacs-23 to trunk
64
65 The following description uses bound branches, presumably it works in
66 a similar way with unbound ones.
67
68 0) (First time only) Get the bzr changelog_merge plugin
69 (this will be included by default in bzr 2.4 onwards):
70
71 cd ~/.bazaar/plugins
72 # The following is an improved version of: lp:bzr-changelog-merge
73 bzr branch lp:~spiv/bzr-changelog-merge/non-head-edits-723968
74 mv bzr-changelog-merge changelog_merge
75
76 This should make merging ChangeLogs smoother. It merges new entries
77 to the top of the file, rather than trying to fit them in mid-way
78 through. Newer versions of the plugin should also be able to deal
79 with changes to *old* ChangeLog entries, that should not be floated to
80 the head of the file (see launchpad#723968).
81
82 Maybe the default Emacs behavior without this plugin is better,
83 though, it's not clear yet.
84
85 1) Get clean, up-to-date copies of the emacs-23 and trunk branches.
86 Check for any uncommitted changes with bzr status.
87
88 2) M-x cd /path/to/trunk
89
90 The first time only, do this:
91 cd .bzr/branch
92 Add the following line to branch.conf:
93 changelog_merge_files = ChangeLog
94
95 3) load admin/bzrmerge.el
96
97 4) M-x bzrmerge RET /path/to/emacs-23 RET
98
99 It will prompt about revisions that should be skipped, based on the
100 regexp in bzrmerge-missing. If there are more revisions that you know
101 need skipping, you'll have to do that by hand.
102
103 5) It will stop if there are any conflicts. Resolve them.
104 Using smerge-mode, there are menu items to skip to the next conflict,
105 and to take either the trunk, branch, or both copies.
106
107 6) After resolving all conflicts, you might need to run the bzmerge
108 command again if there are more revisions still to merge.
109
110 Do not commit (or exit Emacs) until you have run bzrmerge to completion.
111
112 Before committing, check bzr status and bzr diff output.
113 If you have run bzrmerge enough times, the "pending merge tip" in bzr
114 status should be the last revision from the emacs-23 branch, and
115 bzr status -v should show all the revisions you expect to merge.
116
117 (Note that it will also show "skipped" revisions. This is expected,
118 and is due to a technical limitation of bzr. The log data for those
119 revisions gets merged, the actual changes themselves do not.
120 http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2011-01/msg00609.html )
121
122 In particular, check the ChangeLog entries (eg in case too many
123 entries have been included or whitespace between entries needs fixing).
124 bzrmerge tries to fix up the dates to today's date, but it only does
125 this where there are conflicts. If you used the changelog_merge plugin,
126 there won't be any conflicts, and (at time of writing) you will need
127 to adjust dates by hand. In any case, if someone made multiple
128 ChangeLog entries on different days in the branch, you may wish to
129 collapse them all to a single entry for that author in the trunk
130 (because in the trunk they all appear under the same date).
131 Obviously, if there are multiple changes to the same file by different
132 authors, don't break the logical ordering in doing this.
133
134 Notes:
135
136 1) A lot that was in tramp.el in emacs-23 has moved to tramp-sh.el in
137 the trunk. If you end up with a conflict in tramp.el, the changes may
138 need to go to tramp-sh.el instead. Remember to update the file name in
139 the ChangeLog.
140
141 2) If a file is modified in emacs-23, and deleted in the trunk, you
142 get a "contents conflict". Assuming the changes don't need to be in
143 the trunk at all, use `bzr resolve path/to/file --take-this' to keep the
144 trunk version. Prior to bzr 2.2.3, this may fail. You can just
145 delete the .OTHER etc files by hand and use bzr resolve path/to/file.
146
147 3) Conflicts in autoload md5sums in comments. Strictly speaking, the
148 right thing to do is merge everything else, resolve the conflict by
149 choosing either the trunk or branch version, then run `make -C lisp
150 autoloads' to update the md5sums to the correct trunk value before
151 committing.
152
153 * Re-adding a file that has been removed from the repository
154
155 It's easy to get this wrong. Let's suppose you've done:
156
157 bzr remove file; bzr commit
158
159 and now, sometime later, you realize this was a mistake and file needs
160 to be brought back. DON'T just do:
161
162 bzr add file; bzr commit
163
164 This restores file, but without its history (`bzr log file' will be
165 very short). This is because file gets re-added with a new file-id
166 (use `bzr file-id file' to see the id).
167
168 Insteading of adding the file, try:
169
170 bzr revert -rN file; bzr commit
171
172 where revision N+1 is the one where file was removed.
173
174 You could also try `bzr add --file-ids-from', if you have a copy of
175 another branch where file still exists.