html updates
[clinton/website/site/unknownlamer.org.git] / Politics.html
1 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
2 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
3 "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
4 <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
5 <head>
6 <title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
7 <meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
8 <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
9 content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
10 <link href="http://feeds.unknownlamer.org/rss/site-updates"
11 rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Updates Feed" />
12
13 <link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" />
14 </head>
15 <body>
16 <h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
17 <div class="contents">
18 <dl>
19 <dt>
20 <a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
21 </dt>
22 <dt>
23 <a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
24 </dt>
25 <dd>
26 <dl>
27 <dt>
28 <a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
29 </dt>
30 <dt>
31 <a href="#sec4">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
32 </dt>
33 </dl>
34 </dd>
35 <dt>
36 <a href="#sec5">Misc</a>
37 </dt>
38 <dd>
39 <dl>
40 <dt>
41 <a href="#sec6">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
42 </dt>
43 <dt>
44 <a href="#sec7">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
45 </dt>
46 <dd>
47 <dl>
48 <dt>
49 <a href="#sec8">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
50 </dt>
51 <dt>
52 <a href="#sec9">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
53 </dt>
54 </dl>
55 </dd>
56 </dl>
57 </dd>
58 <dt>
59 <a href="#sec10">Social Ills</a>
60 </dt>
61 <dd>
62 <dl>
63 <dt>
64 <a href="#sec11">Mass Culture</a>
65 </dt>
66 <dt>
67 <a href="#sec12">The Automobile</a>
68 </dt>
69 <dt>
70 <a href="#sec13">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
71 </dt>
72 </dl>
73 </dd>
74 </dl>
75 </div>
76
77
78 <!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
79 a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
80 socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
81 dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
82 as <em>curmudgeonly bastard</em> if you must have a label for it. This is only
83 because being a curmudgeonly bastard isn't an ideology, but rather a
84 broad set of ideas centered around the rejection of traditional
85 political and social structures (<em>i.e</em> hating everything). I reject the
86 <em>ressentiment</em> (lookit I'm Nietzsche) of traditional anarchism and
87 believe not that every man should have no master (for then <em>all</em> would
88 be weak), but rather that he should be his own master.</p>
89
90 <p>These short essays are mere stubs I wrote a long while ago, and each
91 will perhaps be extended in the future.</p>
92
93 <h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
94 <a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>
95
96 <p class="first">I read some things and thought they were cool. Now I can make people
97 think I'm smarter than I really am.</p>
98
99
100 <h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
101 The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>
102
103 <h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
104 The Government of the Unites States</h3>
105
106 <p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
107 broken beyond repair (perhaps this is a bit conservative, but one must
108 hope). As it stands the government above the local level (and even
109 there!) ignores the individual citizen and instead is only forced to
110 do anything by large scale action. As far as the individual is
111 concerned we no longer live in a Republic, but rather in an Plutocracy
112 which is quickly descending into something far worse.</p>
113
114
115 <h3><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
116 Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>
117
118 <p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
119 economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
120 attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
121 profit?</p>
122
123 <p>But then again, what does <em>evil</em> mean?</p>
124
125
126
127 <h2><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
128 Misc</h2>
129
130 <h3><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
131 Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>
132
133
134
135
136
137 <p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
138 material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
139 derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
140 item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
141 that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>
142
143
144
145
146 <p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
147 route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
148 the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
149 (printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
150 importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
151 way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
152 make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
153 to determine the value on their own.</p>
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163 <p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
164 painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
165 structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
166 an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
167 weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
168 them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
169 a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
170 which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
171 control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
172 result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>
173
174 <p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
175 creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
176 continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
177 written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
178 to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
179 works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
180 ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
181 the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
182 old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
183 work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
184 that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
185 property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
186 by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>
187
188
189
190
191 <p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
192 compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
193 the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
194 property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
195 judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
196 copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
197 determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
198 give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
199 within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
200 continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
201 and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
202 stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
203 becoming unavailable.</p>
204
205
206
207
208
209
210 <p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
211 ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
212 their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
213 unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
214 be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
215 that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
216 number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
217 creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
218 work.</p>
219
220 <p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
221 copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
222 keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
223 sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
224 coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
225 public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
226 person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
227 them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
228 (e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
229 to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
230 increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
231 made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>
232
233 <p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
234 really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
235 relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
236 reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
237 generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
238 generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
239 (issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
240 play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
241 of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
242 for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
243 between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
244 dying (from my eyes).</p>
245
246 <p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
247 grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
248 the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
249 lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
250 generations.</p>
251
252
253 <h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
254 Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>
255
256 <h4><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
257 Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>
258
259
260 <h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
261 Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>
262
263 <p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
264 power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
265 that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
266 is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
267 and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
268 gives a large corporation much more than this.</p>
269
270 <h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>
271
272
273 <h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>
274
275
276
277
278
279 <h2><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
280 Social Ills</h2>
281
282 <h3><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
283 Mass Culture</h3>
284
285 <p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
286 is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
287 people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
288 not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
289 to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
290 nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
291 and have his social options severely limited.</p>
292
293 <p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
294 hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
295 mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
296 individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
297 thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
298 discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
299 are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
300 exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>
301
302
303 <h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
304 The Automobile</h3>
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331 <h3><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
332 Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>
333
334 <p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>
335
336 <p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>
337
338
339
340 <!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->
341
342 <p class="cke-buttons">
343 <!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
344 <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
345 src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
346 alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
347
348 <a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
349 src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
350 ]" /></a>
351
352 <a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
353 src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
354
355 <a href="http://hcoop.net/">
356 <img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png"
357 alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
358 </a>
359
360 <a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
361 <img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
362 alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
363 </a>
364 </p>
365
366 <p class="cke-footer"> No seed of hope nor ray of light,
367 Scant succour from the blighted epoch.
368 Rise like Socrates and fight;
369 Take hate's chalice laced with hemlock.
370 </p>
371 <p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
372 December 11, 2008</p>
373 </body>
374 </html>