[clinton/website/site/unknownlamer.org.git] / Politics.html

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
    <meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
          content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <link href="http://feeds.unknownlamer.org/rss/site-updates" 
          rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Updates Feed" />

<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" media="screen" />
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
   <div class="contents">
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec4">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec5">Misc</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec6">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec7">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec8">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec9">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec10">Social Ills</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec11">Mass Culture</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec12">The Automobile</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec13">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>


<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
as <em>positive anarchism</em> if you must have a label for it. This is only
because anarchism isn't an ideology, but rather a broad set of ideas
centered around the rejection of traditional heriarchial political and
social structures. I reject the <em>ressentiment</em> of traditional anarchism
and believe not that every man should have no master, but rather that
he should be his own master.</p>

<p>These short essays are continually evolving, and each will be split
into its own page as the ideas contained within it are fleshed out in
my mind. Writing things down tends to help me to do this for there are
limits to how much information the top of my head can hold limiting
the usefulness of internal thought once an idea becomes complex
enough. Political and social beliefs are perhaps the most complicated
ideas a man can have because of our complex intertwined social
structures.</p>

<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>

<p class="first">It is often helpful to know what someone considers as the basis of his
philosophy when interpeting what he has written. As such I have
compiled a page of links and quotations to reveal the inner secrets of
my mind.</p>


<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>

<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
The Government of the Unites States</h3>

<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
broken beyond repair. As it stands the government above the local
level ignores the individual citizen and instead is only affected by
large scale action. As far as the individual is concerned we no longer
live in a Republic, but rather in an Oligarchy which is quickly
descending into something far worse.</p>

<p>I do feel that there is still some reform that could be made in the
near (ten years perhaps) future that could allow the government to
become tolerable again. We are, however, quite close to the edge where
there will be no fixing it. If that threshold is passed we are in for
terrible times.</p>


<h3><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>

<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
profit?</p>


<h2><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
Misc</h2>

<h3><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>


<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>


<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
to determine the value on their own.</p>


<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>

<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>


<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
becoming unavailable.</p>


<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
work.</p>

<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>

<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
dying (from my eyes).</p>

<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
generations.</p>


<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>

<h4><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>


<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>

<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
gives a large corporation much more power than the simple sum of its
members.</p>

<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>


<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>


<h2><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
Social Ills</h2>

<h3><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
Mass Culture</h3>

<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
and have his social options severely limited.</p>

<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>


<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
The Automobile</h3>


<h3><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>

<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>

<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>


  <!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->

  <p class="cke-buttons">
    <!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
    <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
	]" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://hcoop.net/">
      <img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png" 
	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
    </a>

    <a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
      <img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
    </a>
  </p>

<p class="cke-footer">                       We live in a time of revolution
                    We swim the silent seas of sanity gone
</p>
<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
    September 26, 2008</p>
  </body>
</html>
Commit	Line	Data
2aff8b5c	1	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
	2	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
	3	"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
	4	<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	5	<head>
	6	<title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
	7	<meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
	8	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
	9	content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
a7e21d41	10	<link href="http://feeds.unknownlamer.org/rss/site-updates"
	11	rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Updates Feed" />
	12
2aff8b5c	13	<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" media="screen" />
	14	</head>
	15	<body>
	16	<h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
	17	<div class="contents">
	18	<dl>
	19	<dt>
	20	<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
	21	</dt>
	22	<dt>
	23	<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
	24	</dt>
	25	<dd>
	26	<dl>
	27	<dt>
	28	<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
	29	</dt>
	30	<dt>
	31	<a href="#sec4">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
	32	</dt>
	33	</dl>
	34	</dd>
	35	<dt>
	36	<a href="#sec5">Misc</a>
	37	</dt>
	38	<dd>
	39	<dl>
	40	<dt>
	41	<a href="#sec6">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
	42	</dt>
	43	<dt>
	44	<a href="#sec7">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
	45	</dt>
	46	<dd>
	47	<dl>
	48	<dt>
	49	<a href="#sec8">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
	50	</dt>
	51	<dt>
	52	<a href="#sec9">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
	53	</dt>
	54	</dl>
	55	</dd>
	56	</dl>
	57	</dd>
	58	<dt>
	59	<a href="#sec10">Social Ills</a>
	60	</dt>
	61	<dd>
	62	<dl>
	63	<dt>
	64	<a href="#sec11">Mass Culture</a>
	65	</dt>
	66	<dt>
	67	<a href="#sec12">The Automobile</a>
	68	</dt>
	69	<dt>
	70	<a href="#sec13">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
	71	</dt>
	72	</dl>
	73	</dd>
	74	</dl>
	75	</div>
	76
77
78	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
79	a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
80	socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
81	dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
a7e21d41	82	as <em>positive anarchism</em> if you must have a label for it. This is only
2aff8b5c	83	because anarchism isn't an ideology, but rather a broad set of ideas
2aff8b5c	84	centered around the rejection of traditional heriarchial political and
a7e21d41	85	social structures. I reject the <em>ressentiment</em> of traditional anarchism
	86	and believe not that every man should have no master, but rather that
	87	he should be his own master.</p>
2aff8b5c	88
	89	<p>These short essays are continually evolving, and each will be split
	90	into its own page as the ideas contained within it are fleshed out in
	91	my mind. Writing things down tends to help me to do this for there are
	92	limits to how much information the top of my head can hold limiting
	93	the usefulness of internal thought once an idea becomes complex
	94	enough. Political and social beliefs are perhaps the most complicated
	95	ideas a man can have because of our complex intertwined social
	96	structures.</p>
	97
	98	<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
	99	<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>
	100
	101	<p class="first">It is often helpful to know what someone considers as the basis of his
	102	philosophy when interpeting what he has written. As such I have
	103	compiled a page of links and quotations to reveal the inner secrets of
	104	my mind.</p>
	105
	106
	107	<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
	108	The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>
	109
	110	<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
	111	The Government of the Unites States</h3>
	112
	113	<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
	114	broken beyond repair. As it stands the government above the local
	115	level ignores the individual citizen and instead is only affected by
	116	large scale action. As far as the individual is concerned we no longer
	117	live in a Republic, but rather in an Oligarchy which is quickly
	118	descending into something far worse.</p>
	119
	120	<p>I do feel that there is still some reform that could be made in the
	121	near (ten years perhaps) future that could allow the government to
	122	become tolerable again. We are, however, quite close to the edge where
	123	there will be no fixing it. If that threshold is passed we are in for
	124	terrible times.</p>
	125
	126
	127	<h3><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
	128	Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>
	129
	130	<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
	131	economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
	132	attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
	133	profit?</p>
	134
	135
	136
	137	<h2><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
	138	Misc</h2>
	139
	140	<h3><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
	141	Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>
	142
	143
	144
	145
	146
	147	<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
	148	material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
	149	derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
	150	item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
	151	that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>
152
153
154
155
156	<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
157	route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
158	the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
159	(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
160	importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
161	way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
162	make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
163	to determine the value on their own.</p>
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173	<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
174	painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
175	structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
176	an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
177	weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
178	them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
179	a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
180	which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
181	control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
182	result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>
183
184	<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
185	creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
186	continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
187	written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
188	to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
189	works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
190	ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
191	the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
192	old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
193	work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
194	that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
195	property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
196	by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>
197
198
199
200
201	<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
202	compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
203	the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
204	property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
205	judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
206	copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
207	determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
208	give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
209	within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
210	continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
211	and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
212	stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
213	becoming unavailable.</p>
214
215
216
217
218
219
220	<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
221	ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
222	their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
223	unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
224	be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
225	that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
226	number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
227	creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
228	work.</p>
229
230	<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
231	copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
232	keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
233	sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
234	coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
235	public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
236	person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
237	them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
238	(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
239	to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
240	increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
241	made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>
242
243	<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
244	really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
245	relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
246	reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
247	generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
248	generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
249	(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
250	play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
251	of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
252	for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
253	between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
254	dying (from my eyes).</p>
255
256	<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
257	grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
258	the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
259	lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
260	generations.</p>
261
262
263	<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
264	Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>
265
266	<h4><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
267	Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>
268
269
270	<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
271	Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>
272
273	<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
274	power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
275	that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
276	is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
277	and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
278	gives a large corporation much more power than the simple sum of its
279	members.</p>
280
281	<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>
282
283
284	<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>
285
286
287
288
289
290	<h2><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
291	Social Ills</h2>
292
293	<h3><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
294	Mass Culture</h3>
295
296	<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
297	is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
298	people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
299	not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
300	to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
301	nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
302	and have his social options severely limited.</p>
303
304	<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
305	hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
306	mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
307	individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
308	thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
309	discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
310	are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
311	exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>
312
313
314	<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
315	The Automobile</h3>
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337
338
339
340
341
342	<h3><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
343	Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>
344
345	<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>
346
347	<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>
348
349
350
351	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->
352
353	<p class="cke-buttons">
354	<!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
355	<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
356	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
357	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
358
359	<a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
360	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
361	]" /></a>
362
363	<a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
364	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
365
366	<a href="http://hcoop.net/">
367	<img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png"
368	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
369	</a>
370
371	<a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
372	<img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
373	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
374	</a>
375	</p>
376
cb44b69b	377	<p class="cke-footer"> We live in a time of revolution
cb44b69b	378	We swim the silent seas of sanity gone
2aff8b5c	379	</p>
2aff8b5c	380	<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
a7e21d41	381	September 26, 2008</p>
2aff8b5c	382	</body>
2aff8b5c	383	</html>