[clinton/website/site/unknownlamer.org.git] / Politics.html

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
    <meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
          content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
    <link href="http://feeds.unknownlamer.org/rss/site-updates" 
          rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Updates Feed" />

<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" />
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
   <div class="contents">
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec4">Healthcare <em>Reform</em></a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec5">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec6">Misc</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec7">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec8">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec9">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec10">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec11">Social Ills</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec12">Mass Culture</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec13">The Talking Heads</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec14">The Automobile</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec15">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>


<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
as <em>curmudgeonly bastard</em> if you must have a label for it. This is only
because being a curmudgeonly bastard isn't an ideology, but rather a
broad set of ideas centered around the rejection of traditional
political and social structures (<em>i.e</em> hating everything). I reject the
<em>ressentiment</em> (lookit I'm Nietzsche) of traditional anarchism and
believe not that every man should have no master (for then <em>all</em> would
be weak), but rather that he should be his own master (does that even
<em>mean</em> anything? Eh, it sounds nice so who cares).</p>

<p>These short essays are mere stubs I wrote a long while ago, and each
will perhaps be extended in the future.</p>

<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>

<p class="first">I read some things and thought they were cool. Now I can make people
think I'm smarter than I really am.</p>


<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>

<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
The Government of the Unites States</h3>

<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
broken beyond repair (perhaps this is a bit conservative, but one must
hope). As it stands the government above the local level (and even
there!) ignores the individual citizen and instead is only forced to
do anything by large scale action. As far as the individual is
concerned we no longer live in a Republic, but rather in an Plutocracy
which is quickly descending into something far worse.</p>

<h4><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
Healthcare <em>Reform</em></h4>

<p class="first">Upon airing my objections to the current Healthcare <em>Reform</em> bill, I was
asked: did you read the bill? To which I replied with action and read
<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3590&amp;tab=summary">the official summary of the bill</a>. And now I ask those who asked me if
I had read it: have <em>you</em> read it. I received as a reply an unequivocal:
<em>why should I have to</em>.</p>

<p>Fun fact: it isn't as bad as some people make it seem, but guess what?
<em>It does nothing beneficial to the individual</em>. All it does it require
that anyone over 30 purchase insurance, severely restricts the usage
of Health Savings Accounts (which, may be not so bad&mdash;I have no
opinion on their usefulness... but <em>Republicans</em> created them so they
<em>must</em> be <em>evil</em>), and is generally a piece of hey-look-I-did-something
(but nothing goes into effect until I am out of office)
legislation. This has never happened before, obviously. We are on the
surface of Mars now too didn't you know.</p>

<p>Meanwhile there is what amounts to no price controls, an actual <em>ban</em> on
the formation of State run healthcare (until 2017, and then only at
the discretion of the HHS secretary), and token (unfunded) support for
the formation of healthcare cooperatives. There are some taxes on
large drug makers, but the research required by the FDA for drug
approval is <em>tax deductible</em> (and so the larger drug makers can avoid
most of the new taxes, har). And... an excise tax on overly fancy
healthcare plans... more or less, a nice bill that, if it manages to
not be overturned by 2018, will do absolutely nothing one way or the
other.</p>

<p>It is obvious that I am indeed a dirty Nazi redneck terrorist
teabagger Republican piece of shit who hates the poor and black
people. I guess it's time for my white ass to move to Iran and see how
I like it there!</p>


<h3><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>

<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
profit?</p>

<p>But then again, what does <em>evil</em> mean?</p>


<h2><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
Misc</h2>

<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>


<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>


<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
to determine the value on their own.</p>


<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>

<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>


<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
becoming unavailable.</p>


<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
work.</p>

<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>

<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
dying (from my eyes).</p>

<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
generations.</p>


<h3><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>

<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>


<h4><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>

<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
gives a large corporation much more than this.</p>

<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>


<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>


<h2><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
Social Ills</h2>

<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
Mass Culture</h3>

<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
and have his social options severely limited.</p>

<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>

<h4><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
The Talking Heads</h4>

<p class="first">Poison the well. Burn a strawman.</p>

<p>This is real argument. Real thought.</p>


<h3><a name="sec14" id="sec14"></a>
The Automobile</h3>


<h3><a name="sec15" id="sec15"></a>
Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>

<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>

<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>


  <!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->

  <p class="cke-buttons">
    <!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
    <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
	]" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://hcoop.net/">
      <img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png" 
	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
    </a>

    <a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
      <img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
    </a>
  </p>

<p class="cke-footer">Corinne: this is why we should have designated bath buddies
Corinne: to get places you cant reach because youre slippery and in
         case you get a lil tooo slippery and crack your head open
         someone can call the coast guard and save you
</p>
<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
    April  4, 2010</p>
  </body>
</html>
Commit	Line	Data
2aff8b5c	1	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
	2	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
	3	"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
	4	<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	5	<head>
	6	<title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
	7	<meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
	8	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
	9	content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
a7e21d41	10	<link href="http://feeds.unknownlamer.org/rss/site-updates"
	11	rel="alternate" type="application/rss+xml" title="Updates Feed" />
	12
9dcdb59d	13	<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" />
2aff8b5c	14	</head>
	15	<body>
	16	<h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
	17	<div class="contents">
	18	<dl>
	19	<dt>
	20	<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
	21	</dt>
	22	<dt>
	23	<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
	24	</dt>
	25	<dd>
	26	<dl>
	27	<dt>
	28	<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
	29	</dt>
4863a6da	30	<dd>
	31	<dl>
	32	<dt>
	33	<a href="#sec4">Healthcare <em>Reform</em></a>
	34	</dt>
	35	</dl>
	36	</dd>
2aff8b5c	37	<dt>
4863a6da	38	<a href="#sec5">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
2aff8b5c	39	</dt>
	40	</dl>
	41	</dd>
	42	<dt>
4863a6da	43	<a href="#sec6">Misc</a>
2aff8b5c	44	</dt>
	45	<dd>
	46	<dl>
	47	<dt>
4863a6da	48	<a href="#sec7">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
2aff8b5c	49	</dt>
2aff8b5c	50	<dt>
4863a6da	51	<a href="#sec8">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
2aff8b5c	52	</dt>
	53	<dd>
	54	<dl>
	55	<dt>
4863a6da	56	<a href="#sec9">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
2aff8b5c	57	</dt>
2aff8b5c	58	<dt>
4863a6da	59	<a href="#sec10">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
2aff8b5c	60	</dt>
	61	</dl>
	62	</dd>
	63	</dl>
	64	</dd>
	65	<dt>
4863a6da	66	<a href="#sec11">Social Ills</a>
2aff8b5c	67	</dt>
	68	<dd>
	69	<dl>
	70	<dt>
4863a6da	71	<a href="#sec12">Mass Culture</a>
2aff8b5c	72	</dt>
4863a6da	73	<dd>
	74	<dl>
	75	<dt>
	76	<a href="#sec13">The Talking Heads</a>
	77	</dt>
	78	</dl>
	79	</dd>
2aff8b5c	80	<dt>
4863a6da	81	<a href="#sec14">The Automobile</a>
2aff8b5c	82	</dt>
2aff8b5c	83	<dt>
4863a6da	84	<a href="#sec15">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
2aff8b5c	85	</dt>
	86	</dl>
	87	</dd>
	88	</dl>
	89	</div>
	90
	91
	92	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
	93	a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
	94	socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
	95	dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
9dcdb59d	96	as <em>curmudgeonly bastard</em> if you must have a label for it. This is only
c2a3216c	97	because being a curmudgeonly bastard isn't an ideology, but rather a
9dcdb59d	98	broad set of ideas centered around the rejection of traditional
c2a3216c	99	political and social structures (<em>i.e</em> hating everything). I reject the
	100	<em>ressentiment</em> (lookit I'm Nietzsche) of traditional anarchism and
	101	believe not that every man should have no master (for then <em>all</em> would
4863a6da	102	be weak), but rather that he should be his own master (does that even
4863a6da	103	<em>mean</em> anything? Eh, it sounds nice so who cares).</p>
9dcdb59d	104
	105	<p>These short essays are mere stubs I wrote a long while ago, and each
	106	will perhaps be extended in the future.</p>
2aff8b5c	107
	108	<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
	109	<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>
	110
9dcdb59d	111	<p class="first">I read some things and thought they were cool. Now I can make people
9dcdb59d	112	think I'm smarter than I really am.</p>
2aff8b5c	113
	114
	115	<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
	116	The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>
	117
	118	<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
	119	The Government of the Unites States</h3>
	120
	121	<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
9dcdb59d	122	broken beyond repair (perhaps this is a bit conservative, but one must
	123	hope). As it stands the government above the local level (and even
	124	there!) ignores the individual citizen and instead is only forced to
	125	do anything by large scale action. As far as the individual is
	126	concerned we no longer live in a Republic, but rather in an Plutocracy
	127	which is quickly descending into something far worse.</p>
2aff8b5c	128
4863a6da	129	<h4><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
	130	Healthcare <em>Reform</em></h4>
	131
	132	<p class="first">Upon airing my objections to the current Healthcare <em>Reform</em> bill, I was
	133	asked: did you read the bill? To which I replied with action and read
	134	<a href="http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=h111-3590&tab=summary">the official summary of the bill</a>. And now I ask those who asked me if
	135	I had read it: have <em>you</em> read it. I received as a reply an unequivocal:
	136	<em>why should I have to</em>.</p>
	137
	138	<p>Fun fact: it isn't as bad as some people make it seem, but guess what?
	139	<em>It does nothing beneficial to the individual</em>. All it does it require
	140	that anyone over 30 purchase insurance, severely restricts the usage
	141	of Health Savings Accounts (which, may be not so bad—I have no
	142	opinion on their usefulness... but <em>Republicans</em> created them so they
	143	<em>must</em> be <em>evil</em>), and is generally a piece of hey-look-I-did-something
	144	(but nothing goes into effect until I am out of office)
	145	legislation. This has never happened before, obviously. We are on the
	146	surface of Mars now too didn't you know.</p>
	147
	148	<p>Meanwhile there is what amounts to no price controls, an actual <em>ban</em> on
	149	the formation of State run healthcare (until 2017, and then only at
	150	the discretion of the HHS secretary), and token (unfunded) support for
	151	the formation of healthcare cooperatives. There are some taxes on
	152	large drug makers, but the research required by the FDA for drug
	153	approval is <em>tax deductible</em> (and so the larger drug makers can avoid
	154	most of the new taxes, har). And... an excise tax on overly fancy
	155	healthcare plans... more or less, a nice bill that, if it manages to
	156	not be overturned by 2018, will do absolutely nothing one way or the
	157	other.</p>
	158
	159	<p>It is obvious that I am indeed a dirty Nazi redneck terrorist
	160	teabagger Republican piece of shit who hates the poor and black
	161	people. I guess it's time for my white ass to move to Iran and see how
	162	I like it there!</p>
	163
	164
	165
	166	<h3><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
2aff8b5c	167	Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>
	168
	169	<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
	170	economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
	171	attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
	172	profit?</p>
	173
9dcdb59d	174	<p>But then again, what does <em>evil</em> mean?</p>
9dcdb59d	175
2aff8b5c	176
2aff8b5c	177
4863a6da	178	<h2><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
2aff8b5c	179	Misc</h2>
2aff8b5c	180
4863a6da	181	<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
2aff8b5c	182	Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>
	183
	184
	185
	186
	187
	188	<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
	189	material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
	190	derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
	191	item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
	192	that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>
	193
	194
	195
	196
	197	<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
	198	route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
	199	the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
	200	(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
	201	importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
	202	way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
	203	make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
	204	to determine the value on their own.</p>
	205
	206
	207
	208
	209
	210
	211
	212
	213
	214	<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
	215	painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
	216	structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
	217	an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
	218	weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
	219	them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
	220	a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
	221	which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
	222	control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
	223	result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>
	224
	225	<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
	226	creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
	227	continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
	228	written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
	229	to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
	230	works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
	231	ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
	232	the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
	233	old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
	234	work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
	235	that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
	236	property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
	237	by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>
	238
	239
	240
	241
	242	<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
	243	compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
	244	the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
	245	property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
246	judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
247	copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
248	determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
249	give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
250	within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
251	continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
252	and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
253	stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
254	becoming unavailable.</p>
255
256
257
258
259
260
261	<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
262	ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
263	their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
264	unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
265	be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
266	that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
267	number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
268	creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
269	work.</p>
270
271	<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
272	copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
273	keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
274	sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
275	coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
276	public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
277	person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
278	them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
279	(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
280	to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
281	increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
282	made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>
283
284	<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
285	really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
286	relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
287	reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
288	generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
289	generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
290	(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
291	play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
292	of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
293	for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
294	between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
295	dying (from my eyes).</p>
296
297	<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
298	grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
299	the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
300	lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
301	generations.</p>
302
303
4863a6da	304	<h3><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
2aff8b5c	305	Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>
2aff8b5c	306
4863a6da	307	<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
2aff8b5c	308	Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>
	309
	310
4863a6da	311	<h4><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
2aff8b5c	312	Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>
	313
	314	<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
	315	power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
	316	that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
	317	is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
	318	and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
9dcdb59d	319	gives a large corporation much more than this.</p>
2aff8b5c	320
	321	<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>
	322
	323
	324	<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>
	325
	326
	327
	328
	329
4863a6da	330	<h2><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
2aff8b5c	331	Social Ills</h2>
2aff8b5c	332
4863a6da	333	<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
2aff8b5c	334	Mass Culture</h3>
	335
	336	<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
	337	is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
	338	people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
	339	not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
	340	to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
	341	nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
	342	and have his social options severely limited.</p>
	343
	344	<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
	345	hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
	346	mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
	347	individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
	348	thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
	349	discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
	350	are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
	351	exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>
	352
4863a6da	353	<h4><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
4863a6da	354	The Talking Heads</h4>
2aff8b5c	355
4863a6da	356	<p class="first">Poison the well. Burn a strawman.</p>
	357
	358	<p>This is real argument. Real thought.</p>
	359
	360
	361
	362	<h3><a name="sec14" id="sec14"></a>
2aff8b5c	363	The Automobile</h3>
	364
	365
	366
	367
	368
	369
	370
	371
	372
	373
	374
	375
	376
	377
	378
	379
	380
	381
	382
	383
	384
	385
	386
	387
	388
	389
4863a6da	390	<h3><a name="sec15" id="sec15"></a>
2aff8b5c	391	Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>
	392
	393	<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>
	394
	395	<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>
	396
	397
	398
	399	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->
	400
	401	<p class="cke-buttons">
	402	<!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
	403	<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
	404	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
	405	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
	406
	407	<a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
	408	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
	409	]" /></a>
	410
	411	<a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
	412	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
	413
	414	<a href="http://hcoop.net/">
	415	<img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png"
	416	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
	417	</a>
	418
	419	<a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
	420	<img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
	421	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
	422	</a>
	423	</p>
	424
4863a6da	425	<p class="cke-footer">Corinne: this is why we should have designated bath buddies
	426	Corinne: to get places you cant reach because youre slippery and in
	427	case you get a lil tooo slippery and crack your head open
	428	someone can call the coast guard and save you
2aff8b5c	429	</p>
2aff8b5c	430	<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
4863a6da	431	April 4, 2010</p>
2aff8b5c	432	</body>
2aff8b5c	433	</html>