[clinton/website/site/unknownlamer.org.git] / Politics.html

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
    "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
  <head>
    <title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
    <meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
    <meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
          content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" media="screen" />
  </head>
  <body>
    <h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
   <div class="contents">
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec4">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec5">Misc</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec6">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec7">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec8">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec9">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</dd>
<dt>
<a href="#sec10">Social Ills</a>
</dt>
<dd>
<dl>
<dt>
<a href="#sec11">Mass Culture</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec12">The Automobile</a>
</dt>
<dt>
<a href="#sec13">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
</dt>
</dl>
</dd>
</dl>
</div>


<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
as anarchism if you must have a label for it. Naturally this is only
because anarchism isn't an ideology, but rather a broad set of ideas
centered around the rejection of traditional heriarchial political and
social structures.</p>

<p>These short essays are continually evolving, and each will be split
into its own page as the ideas contained within it are fleshed out in
my mind. Writing things down tends to help me to do this for there are
limits to how much information the top of my head can hold limiting
the usefulness of internal thought once an idea becomes complex
enough. Political and social beliefs are perhaps the most complicated
ideas a man can have because of our complex intertwined social
structures.</p>

<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>

<p class="first">It is often helpful to know what someone considers as the basis of his
philosophy when interpeting what he has written. As such I have
compiled a page of links and quotations to reveal the inner secrets of
my mind.</p>


<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>

<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
The Government of the Unites States</h3>

<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
broken beyond repair. As it stands the government above the local
level ignores the individual citizen and instead is only affected by
large scale action. As far as the individual is concerned we no longer
live in a Republic, but rather in an Oligarchy which is quickly
descending into something far worse.</p>

<p>I do feel that there is still some reform that could be made in the
near (ten years perhaps) future that could allow the government to
become tolerable again. We are, however, quite close to the edge where
there will be no fixing it. If that threshold is passed we are in for
terrible times.</p>


<h3><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>

<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
profit?</p>


<h2><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
Misc</h2>

<h3><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>


<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>


<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
to determine the value on their own.</p>


<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>

<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>


<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
becoming unavailable.</p>


<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
work.</p>

<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>

<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
dying (from my eyes).</p>

<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
generations.</p>


<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>

<h4><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>


<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>

<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
gives a large corporation much more power than the simple sum of its
members.</p>

<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>


<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>


<h2><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
Social Ills</h2>

<h3><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
Mass Culture</h3>

<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
and have his social options severely limited.</p>

<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>


<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
The Automobile</h3>


<h3><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>

<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>

<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>


  <!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->

  <p class="cke-buttons">
    <!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
    <a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
	]" /></a>

    <a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
    
    <a href="http://hcoop.net/">
      <img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png" 
	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
    </a>

    <a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
      <img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
    </a>
  </p>

<p class="cke-footer">                       We live in a time of revolution
                    We swim the silent seas of sanity gone
</p>
<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
    March 13, 2008</p>
  </body>
</html>
Commit	Line	Data
2aff8b5c	1	<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>
	2	<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
	3	"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
	4	<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
	5	<head>
	6	<title>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</title>
	7	<meta name="generator" content="muse.el" />
	8	<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
	9	content="text/html; charset=utf-8" />
	10	<link rel="stylesheet" href="default.css" media="screen" />
	11	</head>
	12	<body>
	13	<h1>Do Not Accept the Weak State of Mind in Our Time</h1>
	14	<div class="contents">
	15	<dl>
	16	<dt>
	17	<a href="#sec1">The Basis of My Philosophy</a>
	18	</dt>
	19	<dt>
	20	<a href="#sec2">The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</a>
	21	</dt>
	22	<dd>
	23	<dl>
	24	<dt>
	25	<a href="#sec3">The Government of the Unites States</a>
	26	</dt>
	27	<dt>
	28	<a href="#sec4">Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</a>
	29	</dt>
	30	</dl>
	31	</dd>
	32	<dt>
	33	<a href="#sec5">Misc</a>
	34	</dt>
	35	<dd>
	36	<dl>
	37	<dt>
	38	<a href="#sec6">Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</a>
	39	</dt>
	40	<dt>
	41	<a href="#sec7">Fewer Laws Are Better</a>
	42	</dt>
	43	<dd>
	44	<dl>
	45	<dt>
	46	<a href="#sec8">Individuals should not have their actions regulated</a>
	47	</dt>
	48	<dt>
	49	<a href="#sec9">Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</a>
	50	</dt>
	51	</dl>
	52	</dd>
	53	</dl>
	54	</dd>
	55	<dt>
	56	<a href="#sec10">Social Ills</a>
	57	</dt>
	58	<dd>
	59	<dl>
	60	<dt>
	61	<a href="#sec11">Mass Culture</a>
	62	</dt>
	63	<dt>
	64	<a href="#sec12">The Automobile</a>
65	</dt>
66	<dt>
67	<a href="#sec13">Learned Ignorance and Weakness</a>
68	</dt>
69	</dl>
70	</dd>
71	</dl>
72	</div>
73
74
75	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse begins here --><p>I have views that could perhaps be seen as odd. Do note that I am <strong>not</strong>
76	a liberal; nor am I a conservative. I do not buy into the traditional
77	socieconomic dipole scale, and I also reject the <em>political compass</em> two
78	dimensional scale; my political belief system could best be described
79	as anarchism if you must have a label for it. Naturally this is only
80	because anarchism isn't an ideology, but rather a broad set of ideas
81	centered around the rejection of traditional heriarchial political and
82	social structures.</p>
83
84	<p>These short essays are continually evolving, and each will be split
85	into its own page as the ideas contained within it are fleshed out in
86	my mind. Writing things down tends to help me to do this for there are
87	limits to how much information the top of my head can hold limiting
88	the usefulness of internal thought once an idea becomes complex
89	enough. Political and social beliefs are perhaps the most complicated
90	ideas a man can have because of our complex intertwined social
91	structures.</p>
92
93	<h2><a name="sec1" id="sec1"></a>
94	<a href="Wisdom.html">The Basis of My Philosophy</a></h2>
95
96	<p class="first">It is often helpful to know what someone considers as the basis of his
97	philosophy when interpeting what he has written. As such I have
98	compiled a page of links and quotations to reveal the inner secrets of
99	my mind.</p>
100
101
102	<h2><a name="sec2" id="sec2"></a>
103	The Current Economic and Political Structure Is Broken</h2>
104
105	<h3><a name="sec3" id="sec3"></a>
106	The Government of the Unites States</h3>
107
108	<p class="first">I feel that the government in the United States is very close to being
109	broken beyond repair. As it stands the government above the local
110	level ignores the individual citizen and instead is only affected by
111	large scale action. As far as the individual is concerned we no longer
112	live in a Republic, but rather in an Oligarchy which is quickly
113	descending into something far worse.</p>
114
115	<p>I do feel that there is still some reform that could be made in the
116	near (ten years perhaps) future that could allow the government to
117	become tolerable again. We are, however, quite close to the edge where
118	there will be no fixing it. If that threshold is passed we are in for
119	terrible times.</p>
120
121
122	<h3><a name="sec4" id="sec4"></a>
123	Capitalism is Intrinsically Evil</h3>
124
125	<p class="first">Cooperation is better than exploitation. How can one justify an
126	economic system based upon paying others as little as possible in an
127	attempt to make the most profit from their labor so as to make some
128	profit?</p>
129
130
131
132	<h2><a name="sec5" id="sec5"></a>
133	Misc</h2>
134
135	<h3><a name="sec6" id="sec6"></a>
136	Long Term Copyright Causes Harm to Society (<code>Draft Revision 2</code>)</h3>
137
138
139
140
141
142	<p>It is straightforward to calculate a fair cost for material goods. The
143	material cost follows from the materials, and the labor cost generally
144	derives from the complexity of construction. The fixed price for each
145	item consists of both of these factors. Thus it is trivial to ensure
146	that a craftsman is fairly compensated for his effort.</p>
147
148
149
150
151	<p>Creative works must have their value calculated via a more circuitous
152	route. The physical form of a creative work is of little importance;
153	the ideas it represents are. The material and direct labor costs
154	(printing, binding, etc.) are thus so small as to be of negligible
155	importance when calculating value. There is effectively no objective
156	way to place value on abstract work; all the value judgements we can
157	make are subjective. We must then rely on irrational human valuations
158	to determine the value on their own.</p>
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168	<p>Creative works are fundamentally different from concrete works. A
169	painting may inspire others start a new stylistic movement, the
170	structure of a story may cause the formation of a new literary form,
171	an essay may incite a new political movement, etc. Creative works
172	weave themselves into the mental fabric of each individual exposed to
173	them in a way that material goods cannot. A book may change your life;
174	a table will never do that. This suggests that the abstract concepts
175	which compose a work have a strange nature and great value. Those who
176	control the distribution of creative works wield great power as a
177	result of the ability of ideas to change the individual.</p>
178
179	<p>After a certain period of time the physical manifestation of a
180	creative work loses commercial value. New art is being created
181	continually, and no one can be expected to read every important book
182	written, see every film, and so on for other areas. When a work ceases
183	to be profitable to publish distribution ceases. Allowing abstract
184	works to simply drop from the market creates a serious problem. New
185	ideas are built upon old ones, and after ideas have assimilated into
186	the collective concious it is important to be able to go back to the
187	old ideas and analyze them to understand the present culture. If a
188	work is no longer available it is impossible to do this. Thus works
189	that are no longer being commercially exploited should become the
190	property of the public so that any worth preserving will be preserved
191	by <em>someone</em> and avoid death.</p>
192
193
194
195
196	<p>Copyright manages to work fairly well for ensuring creators are
197	compensated for their effort, preventing abuse of creator rights to
198	the detriment of society, and ensuring that works will become public
199	property after they are commercially unprofitable. Irrational human
200	judgements over time often work well, and so giving exclusive right to
201	copy a work makes sense for a period of time to allow society to
202	determine its monetary value. The fair use provisions of copyright
203	give society reasonable leeway in the use of the ideas contained
204	within a work while the work is protected, and this allows society to
205	continue enriching its creative culture. The limited term of copyright
206	and ensuing reversion to the public domain prevents the cultural
207	stagnation and the loss of history that would result from works
208	becoming unavailable.</p>
209
210
211
212
213
214
215	<p>The term of copyright must be finely balanced between the need to
216	ensure creators have enough time to receive fair compensation for
217	their effort, and the desire to avoid cultural stagnation from
218	unavailable works. The term must be short enough that a work will not
219	be unavailable for too long after commercial interest dies. Every year
220	that passes where the work isn't being published tends to reduce the
221	number of copies in existence. It must also be long enough that a
222	creator can profit according to the value that society puts upon his
223	work.</p>
224
225	<p>A term should be just long enough that a work will fall out of
226	copyright when physical copies are still likely to exist. A man may
227	keep his book collection unto his death, but his children may simply
228	sell them off or discard them after he departs the mortal
229	coil. Intuitive judgement says that things that are worth entering the
230	public domain will be preserved by someone for at least his life. A
231	person who has creative works in his posession is often attached to
232	them and will keep the ones he likes the most for as long as possible
233	(e.g. my music collection is backed up in flac so that I will be able
234	to listen to my music forever). After he dies there is a large
235	increase in the chance that the works will perish unless he by chance
236	made special arrangements to have them preserved.</p>
237
238	<p>A generation then seems to be a reasonable term; how many things are
239	really commercially viable after thirty years? Some works may be
240	relevant to the children of the generation who created them; it seems
241	reasonable then that if a work is still commercially viable after a
242	generation then the creator deserves to retain copyright for a second
243	generation. It is questionable whether more terms would be good
244	(issues of supression of information, right to profit, etc. come into
245	play), but they can't quite be ruled out. A renewal system with a span
246	of roughly thirty years ensures that a work will be out of publication
247	for at most a generation's time. This appears to be a good balance
248	between the right of the creator and the desire to keep knowledge from
249	dying (from my eyes).</p>
250
251	<p>The works of the current generation, their parents, their
252	grandparents, and their great-grandparents are still copyrighted in
253	the US. Works created in the present will be copyrighted for the
254	lifetime of the author and seventy years after; a span of roughly six
255	generations.</p>
256
257
258	<h3><a name="sec7" id="sec7"></a>
259	Fewer Laws Are Better</h3>
260
261	<h4><a name="sec8" id="sec8"></a>
262	Individuals should not have their actions regulated</h4>
263
264
265	<h4><a name="sec9" id="sec9"></a>
266	Corporations must have their actions heavily regulated</h4>
267
268	<p class="first">Corporate power disrupts the functioning of a free society. If the
269	power wielded by a corporation were merely the sum of the individuals
270	that composed it there would be little issue; the fundamental problem
271	is that the benefits of gaining access to mass production facilities
272	and a huge workforce that can be forced to cooperate on certain goals
273	gives a large corporation much more power than the simple sum of its
274	members.</p>
275
276	<h5>Corporate Personhood should be revoked</h5>
277
278
279	<h5>Corporations should not be allowed to influence politics</h5>
280
281
282
283
284
285	<h2><a name="sec10" id="sec10"></a>
286	Social Ills</h2>
287
288	<h3><a name="sec11" id="sec11"></a>
289	Mass Culture</h3>
290
291	<p class="first">American culture in the early 1900s began to homogenize, and now there
292	is a single massive culture that almost all three hundred million
293	people in the country share. This presents problems to those who do
294	not fit in; in the days of the self sufficient village one could move
295	to another location to find people similar to him, but now there is
296	nowhere to go. Everywhere a <em>social deviant</em> goes he will feel alienated
297	and have his social options severely limited.</p>
298
299	<p>A monoculture reduces the rate of idea formation, and ours is actively
300	hostile toward anything not falling in line with the
301	mainstream. People are trained to act as a mass instead of as
302	individuals; this results in far less creative people. Critical
303	thinking is not encouraged; no, it is far worse! Critical thinking is
304	discouraged, and those of us who wish to argue our points with logic
305	are met with the undefeatable enemy of a closed mind that has been
306	exposed to propaganda from birth.</p>
307
308
309	<h3><a name="sec12" id="sec12"></a>
310	The Automobile</h3>
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
334
335
336
337	<h3><a name="sec13" id="sec13"></a>
338	Learned Ignorance and Weakness</h3>
339
340	<p><a href="Old%20Viewpoints.html">obsolete</a></p>
341
342	<p><a href="TRUTH.html">TRUTH</a></p>
343
344
345
346	<!-- Page published by Emacs Muse ends here -->
347
348	<p class="cke-buttons">
349	<!-- validating badges, any browser, etc -->
350	<a href="http://validator.w3.org/check/referer"><img
351	src="http://www.w3.org/Icons/valid-xhtml10"
352	alt="Valid XHTML 1.0!" /></a>
353
354	<a href="http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/"><img
355	src="img/buttons/w3c_ab.png" alt="[ Viewable With Any Browser
356	]" /></a>
357
358	<a href="http://www.debian.org/"><img
359	src="img/buttons/debian.png" alt="[ Powered by Debian ]" /></a>
360
361	<a href="http://hcoop.net/">
362	<img src="img/buttons/hcoop.png"
363	alt="[ Hosted by HCoop]" />
364	</a>
365
366	<a href="http://www.fsf.org/register_form?referrer=114">
367	<img src="img/buttons/fsf_member.png"
368	alt="[ FSF Associate Member ]" />
369	</a>
370	</p>
371
cb44b69b	372	<p class="cke-footer"> We live in a time of revolution
cb44b69b	373	We swim the silent seas of sanity gone
2aff8b5c	374	</p>
	375	<p class="cke-timestamp">Last Modified:
	376	March 13, 2008</p>
	377	</body>
	378	</html>