Fix some word/symbol classifications in scheme-mode's syntax table.

* lisp/progmodes/scheme.el (scheme-mode-syntax-table): Don't use
symbol-constituent as the default, as that stops font-lock from
working properly.

Fixes: debbugs:8843

diff --git a/lisp/ChangeLog b/lisp/ChangeLog
index 02c88ea..e8a6cd7 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/ChangeLog
+++ b/lisp/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+2011-08-22  Chong Yidong  <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
+
+       * progmodes/scheme.el (scheme-mode-syntax-table): Don't use
+       symbol-constituent as the default, as that stops font-lock from
+       working properly (Bug#8843).
+
 2011-08-21  Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen  <larsi@gnus.org>
 
        * mail/smtpmail.el (smtpmail-via-smtp): Only bind

diff --git a/lisp/progmodes/scheme.el b/lisp/progmodes/scheme.el
index 4151e2b..470b309 100644 (file)
--- a/lisp/progmodes/scheme.el
+++ b/lisp/progmodes/scheme.el
@@ -55,24 +55,24 @@
 (defvar scheme-mode-syntax-table
   (let ((st (make-syntax-table))
        (i 0))
-
-    ;; Default is atom-constituent.
-    (while (< i 256)
+    ;; Symbol constituents
+    ;; We used to treat chars 128-256 as symbol-constituent, but they
+    ;; should be valid word constituents (Bug#8843).  Note that valid
+    ;; identifier characters are Scheme-implementation dependent.
+    (while (< i ?0)
       (modify-syntax-entry i "_   " st)
       (setq i (1+ i)))
-
-    ;; Word components.
-    (setq i ?0)
-    (while (<= i ?9)
-      (modify-syntax-entry i "w   " st)
+    (setq i (1+ ?9))
+    (while (< i ?A)
+      (modify-syntax-entry i "_   " st)
       (setq i (1+ i)))
-    (setq i ?A)
-    (while (<= i ?Z)
-      (modify-syntax-entry i "w   " st)
+    (setq i (1+ ?Z))
+    (while (< i ?a)
+      (modify-syntax-entry i "_   " st)
       (setq i (1+ i)))
-    (setq i ?a)
-    (while (<= i ?z)
-      (modify-syntax-entry i "w   " st)
+    (setq i (1+ ?z))
+    (while (< i 128)
+      (modify-syntax-entry i "_   " st)
       (setq i (1+ i)))
 
     ;; Whitespace