Convert consecutive FSF copyright years to ranges.
[bpt/emacs.git] / doc / lispref / functions.texi
CommitLineData
b8d4c8d0
GM
1@c -*-texinfo-*-
2@c This is part of the GNU Emacs Lisp Reference Manual.
73b0cd50 3@c Copyright (C) 1990-1995, 1998-1999, 2001-2011
d24880de 4@c Free Software Foundation, Inc.
b8d4c8d0 5@c See the file elisp.texi for copying conditions.
6336d8c3 6@setfilename ../../info/functions
b8d4c8d0
GM
7@node Functions, Macros, Variables, Top
8@chapter Functions
9
10 A Lisp program is composed mainly of Lisp functions. This chapter
11explains what functions are, how they accept arguments, and how to
12define them.
13
14@menu
15* What Is a Function:: Lisp functions vs. primitives; terminology.
16* Lambda Expressions:: How functions are expressed as Lisp objects.
17* Function Names:: A symbol can serve as the name of a function.
18* Defining Functions:: Lisp expressions for defining functions.
19* Calling Functions:: How to use an existing function.
20* Mapping Functions:: Applying a function to each element of a list, etc.
21* Anonymous Functions:: Lambda expressions are functions with no names.
22* Function Cells:: Accessing or setting the function definition
23 of a symbol.
24* Obsolete Functions:: Declaring functions obsolete.
d24880de 25* Inline Functions:: Defining functions that the compiler will open code.
e31dfb12 26* Declaring Functions:: Telling the compiler that a function is defined.
b8d4c8d0
GM
27* Function Safety:: Determining whether a function is safe to call.
28* Related Topics:: Cross-references to specific Lisp primitives
29 that have a special bearing on how functions work.
30@end menu
31
32@node What Is a Function
33@section What Is a Function?
34
35 In a general sense, a function is a rule for carrying on a computation
36given several values called @dfn{arguments}. The result of the
37computation is called the value of the function. The computation can
38also have side effects: lasting changes in the values of variables or
39the contents of data structures.
40
41 Here are important terms for functions in Emacs Lisp and for other
42function-like objects.
43
44@table @dfn
45@item function
46@cindex function
47In Emacs Lisp, a @dfn{function} is anything that can be applied to
48arguments in a Lisp program. In some cases, we use it more
49specifically to mean a function written in Lisp. Special forms and
50macros are not functions.
51
52@item primitive
53@cindex primitive
54@cindex subr
55@cindex built-in function
56A @dfn{primitive} is a function callable from Lisp that is written in C,
57such as @code{car} or @code{append}. These functions are also called
58@dfn{built-in functions}, or @dfn{subrs}. (Special forms are also
59considered primitives.)
60
61Usually the reason we implement a function as a primitive is either
62because it is fundamental, because it provides a low-level interface
63to operating system services, or because it needs to run fast.
64Primitives can be modified or added only by changing the C sources and
65recompiling the editor. See @ref{Writing Emacs Primitives}.
66
67@item lambda expression
68A @dfn{lambda expression} is a function written in Lisp.
69These are described in the following section.
70@ifnottex
71@xref{Lambda Expressions}.
72@end ifnottex
73
74@item special form
75A @dfn{special form} is a primitive that is like a function but does not
76evaluate all of its arguments in the usual way. It may evaluate only
77some of the arguments, or may evaluate them in an unusual order, or
78several times. Many special forms are described in @ref{Control
79Structures}.
80
81@item macro
82@cindex macro
83A @dfn{macro} is a construct defined in Lisp by the programmer. It
84differs from a function in that it translates a Lisp expression that you
85write into an equivalent expression to be evaluated instead of the
86original expression. Macros enable Lisp programmers to do the sorts of
87things that special forms can do. @xref{Macros}, for how to define and
88use macros.
89
90@item command
91@cindex command
92A @dfn{command} is an object that @code{command-execute} can invoke; it
93is a possible definition for a key sequence. Some functions are
94commands; a function written in Lisp is a command if it contains an
95interactive declaration (@pxref{Defining Commands}). Such a function
96can be called from Lisp expressions like other functions; in this case,
97the fact that the function is a command makes no difference.
98
99Keyboard macros (strings and vectors) are commands also, even though
100they are not functions. A symbol is a command if its function
101definition is a command; such symbols can be invoked with @kbd{M-x}.
102The symbol is a function as well if the definition is a function.
103@xref{Interactive Call}.
104
105@item keystroke command
106@cindex keystroke command
107A @dfn{keystroke command} is a command that is bound to a key sequence
108(typically one to three keystrokes). The distinction is made here
109merely to avoid confusion with the meaning of ``command'' in non-Emacs
110editors; for Lisp programs, the distinction is normally unimportant.
111
112@item byte-code function
113A @dfn{byte-code function} is a function that has been compiled by the
114byte compiler. @xref{Byte-Code Type}.
115@end table
116
117@defun functionp object
118This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is any kind of
9b240644
EZ
119function, i.e.@: can be passed to @code{funcall}. Note that
120@code{functionp} returns @code{nil} for special forms (@pxref{Special
121Forms}).
b8d4c8d0
GM
122@end defun
123
124Unlike @code{functionp}, the next three functions do @emph{not}
125treat a symbol as its function definition.
126
127@defun subrp object
128This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a built-in function
129(i.e., a Lisp primitive).
130
131@example
132@group
133(subrp 'message) ; @r{@code{message} is a symbol,}
134 @result{} nil ; @r{not a subr object.}
135@end group
136@group
137(subrp (symbol-function 'message))
138 @result{} t
139@end group
140@end example
141@end defun
142
143@defun byte-code-function-p object
144This function returns @code{t} if @var{object} is a byte-code
145function. For example:
146
147@example
148@group
149(byte-code-function-p (symbol-function 'next-line))
150 @result{} t
151@end group
152@end example
153@end defun
154
155@defun subr-arity subr
156This function provides information about the argument list of a
157primitive, @var{subr}. The returned value is a pair
158@code{(@var{min} . @var{max})}. @var{min} is the minimum number of
159args. @var{max} is the maximum number or the symbol @code{many}, for a
160function with @code{&rest} arguments, or the symbol @code{unevalled} if
161@var{subr} is a special form.
162@end defun
163
164@node Lambda Expressions
165@section Lambda Expressions
166@cindex lambda expression
167
168 A function written in Lisp is a list that looks like this:
169
170@example
171(lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
172 @r{[}@var{documentation-string}@r{]}
173 @r{[}@var{interactive-declaration}@r{]}
174 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
175@end example
176
177@noindent
178Such a list is called a @dfn{lambda expression}. In Emacs Lisp, it
179actually is valid as an expression---it evaluates to itself. In some
180other Lisp dialects, a lambda expression is not a valid expression at
181all. In either case, its main use is not to be evaluated as an
182expression, but to be called as a function.
183
184@menu
185* Lambda Components:: The parts of a lambda expression.
186* Simple Lambda:: A simple example.
187* Argument List:: Details and special features of argument lists.
188* Function Documentation:: How to put documentation in a function.
189@end menu
190
191@node Lambda Components
192@subsection Components of a Lambda Expression
193
194@ifnottex
195
196 A function written in Lisp (a ``lambda expression'') is a list that
197looks like this:
198
199@example
200(lambda (@var{arg-variables}@dots{})
201 [@var{documentation-string}]
202 [@var{interactive-declaration}]
203 @var{body-forms}@dots{})
204@end example
205@end ifnottex
206
207@cindex lambda list
208 The first element of a lambda expression is always the symbol
209@code{lambda}. This indicates that the list represents a function. The
210reason functions are defined to start with @code{lambda} is so that
211other lists, intended for other uses, will not accidentally be valid as
212functions.
213
214 The second element is a list of symbols---the argument variable names.
215This is called the @dfn{lambda list}. When a Lisp function is called,
216the argument values are matched up against the variables in the lambda
217list, which are given local bindings with the values provided.
218@xref{Local Variables}.
219
220 The documentation string is a Lisp string object placed within the
221function definition to describe the function for the Emacs help
222facilities. @xref{Function Documentation}.
223
224 The interactive declaration is a list of the form @code{(interactive
225@var{code-string})}. This declares how to provide arguments if the
226function is used interactively. Functions with this declaration are called
227@dfn{commands}; they can be called using @kbd{M-x} or bound to a key.
228Functions not intended to be called in this way should not have interactive
229declarations. @xref{Defining Commands}, for how to write an interactive
230declaration.
231
232@cindex body of function
233 The rest of the elements are the @dfn{body} of the function: the Lisp
234code to do the work of the function (or, as a Lisp programmer would say,
235``a list of Lisp forms to evaluate''). The value returned by the
236function is the value returned by the last element of the body.
237
238@node Simple Lambda
239@subsection A Simple Lambda-Expression Example
240
241 Consider for example the following function:
242
243@example
244(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
245@end example
246
247@noindent
248We can call this function by writing it as the @sc{car} of an
249expression, like this:
250
251@example
252@group
253((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
254 1 2 3)
255@end group
256@end example
257
258@noindent
259This call evaluates the body of the lambda expression with the variable
260@code{a} bound to 1, @code{b} bound to 2, and @code{c} bound to 3.
261Evaluation of the body adds these three numbers, producing the result 6;
262therefore, this call to the function returns the value 6.
263
264 Note that the arguments can be the results of other function calls, as in
265this example:
266
267@example
268@group
269((lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))
270 1 (* 2 3) (- 5 4))
271@end group
272@end example
273
274@noindent
275This evaluates the arguments @code{1}, @code{(* 2 3)}, and @code{(- 5
2764)} from left to right. Then it applies the lambda expression to the
277argument values 1, 6 and 1 to produce the value 8.
278
279 It is not often useful to write a lambda expression as the @sc{car} of
280a form in this way. You can get the same result, of making local
281variables and giving them values, using the special form @code{let}
282(@pxref{Local Variables}). And @code{let} is clearer and easier to use.
283In practice, lambda expressions are either stored as the function
284definitions of symbols, to produce named functions, or passed as
285arguments to other functions (@pxref{Anonymous Functions}).
286
287 However, calls to explicit lambda expressions were very useful in the
288old days of Lisp, before the special form @code{let} was invented. At
289that time, they were the only way to bind and initialize local
290variables.
291
292@node Argument List
293@subsection Other Features of Argument Lists
294@kindex wrong-number-of-arguments
295@cindex argument binding
296@cindex binding arguments
297@cindex argument lists, features
298
299 Our simple sample function, @code{(lambda (a b c) (+ a b c))},
300specifies three argument variables, so it must be called with three
301arguments: if you try to call it with only two arguments or four
302arguments, you get a @code{wrong-number-of-arguments} error.
303
304 It is often convenient to write a function that allows certain
305arguments to be omitted. For example, the function @code{substring}
306accepts three arguments---a string, the start index and the end
307index---but the third argument defaults to the @var{length} of the
308string if you omit it. It is also convenient for certain functions to
309accept an indefinite number of arguments, as the functions @code{list}
310and @code{+} do.
311
312@cindex optional arguments
313@cindex rest arguments
314@kindex &optional
315@kindex &rest
316 To specify optional arguments that may be omitted when a function
317is called, simply include the keyword @code{&optional} before the optional
318arguments. To specify a list of zero or more extra arguments, include the
319keyword @code{&rest} before one final argument.
320
321 Thus, the complete syntax for an argument list is as follows:
322
323@example
324@group
325(@var{required-vars}@dots{}
326 @r{[}&optional @var{optional-vars}@dots{}@r{]}
327 @r{[}&rest @var{rest-var}@r{]})
328@end group
329@end example
330
331@noindent
332The square brackets indicate that the @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
333clauses, and the variables that follow them, are optional.
334
335 A call to the function requires one actual argument for each of the
336@var{required-vars}. There may be actual arguments for zero or more of
337the @var{optional-vars}, and there cannot be any actual arguments beyond
338that unless the lambda list uses @code{&rest}. In that case, there may
339be any number of extra actual arguments.
340
341 If actual arguments for the optional and rest variables are omitted,
342then they always default to @code{nil}. There is no way for the
343function to distinguish between an explicit argument of @code{nil} and
344an omitted argument. However, the body of the function is free to
345consider @code{nil} an abbreviation for some other meaningful value.
346This is what @code{substring} does; @code{nil} as the third argument to
347@code{substring} means to use the length of the string supplied.
348
349@cindex CL note---default optional arg
350@quotation
351@b{Common Lisp note:} Common Lisp allows the function to specify what
352default value to use when an optional argument is omitted; Emacs Lisp
353always uses @code{nil}. Emacs Lisp does not support ``supplied-p''
354variables that tell you whether an argument was explicitly passed.
355@end quotation
356
357 For example, an argument list that looks like this:
358
359@example
360(a b &optional c d &rest e)
361@end example
362
363@noindent
364binds @code{a} and @code{b} to the first two actual arguments, which are
365required. If one or two more arguments are provided, @code{c} and
366@code{d} are bound to them respectively; any arguments after the first
367four are collected into a list and @code{e} is bound to that list. If
368there are only two arguments, @code{c} is @code{nil}; if two or three
369arguments, @code{d} is @code{nil}; if four arguments or fewer, @code{e}
370is @code{nil}.
371
372 There is no way to have required arguments following optional
373ones---it would not make sense. To see why this must be so, suppose
374that @code{c} in the example were optional and @code{d} were required.
375Suppose three actual arguments are given; which variable would the
376third argument be for? Would it be used for the @var{c}, or for
377@var{d}? One can argue for both possibilities. Similarly, it makes
378no sense to have any more arguments (either required or optional)
379after a @code{&rest} argument.
380
381 Here are some examples of argument lists and proper calls:
382
383@smallexample
384((lambda (n) (1+ n)) ; @r{One required:}
385 1) ; @r{requires exactly one argument.}
386 @result{} 2
387((lambda (n &optional n1) ; @r{One required and one optional:}
388 (if n1 (+ n n1) (1+ n))) ; @r{1 or 2 arguments.}
389 1 2)
390 @result{} 3
391((lambda (n &rest ns) ; @r{One required and one rest:}
392 (+ n (apply '+ ns))) ; @r{1 or more arguments.}
393 1 2 3 4 5)
394 @result{} 15
395@end smallexample
396
397@node Function Documentation
398@subsection Documentation Strings of Functions
399@cindex documentation of function
400
401 A lambda expression may optionally have a @dfn{documentation string} just
402after the lambda list. This string does not affect execution of the
403function; it is a kind of comment, but a systematized comment which
404actually appears inside the Lisp world and can be used by the Emacs help
405facilities. @xref{Documentation}, for how the @var{documentation-string} is
406accessed.
407
408 It is a good idea to provide documentation strings for all the
409functions in your program, even those that are called only from within
410your program. Documentation strings are like comments, except that they
411are easier to access.
412
413 The first line of the documentation string should stand on its own,
414because @code{apropos} displays just this first line. It should consist
415of one or two complete sentences that summarize the function's purpose.
416
417 The start of the documentation string is usually indented in the
418source file, but since these spaces come before the starting
419double-quote, they are not part of the string. Some people make a
420practice of indenting any additional lines of the string so that the
421text lines up in the program source. @emph{That is a mistake.} The
422indentation of the following lines is inside the string; what looks
423nice in the source code will look ugly when displayed by the help
424commands.
425
426 You may wonder how the documentation string could be optional, since
427there are required components of the function that follow it (the body).
428Since evaluation of a string returns that string, without any side effects,
429it has no effect if it is not the last form in the body. Thus, in
430practice, there is no confusion between the first form of the body and the
431documentation string; if the only body form is a string then it serves both
432as the return value and as the documentation.
433
434 The last line of the documentation string can specify calling
435conventions different from the actual function arguments. Write
436text like this:
437
438@example
439\(fn @var{arglist})
440@end example
441
442@noindent
443following a blank line, at the beginning of the line, with no newline
444following it inside the documentation string. (The @samp{\} is used
445to avoid confusing the Emacs motion commands.) The calling convention
446specified in this way appears in help messages in place of the one
447derived from the actual arguments of the function.
448
449 This feature is particularly useful for macro definitions, since the
450arguments written in a macro definition often do not correspond to the
451way users think of the parts of the macro call.
452
453@node Function Names
454@section Naming a Function
455@cindex function definition
456@cindex named function
457@cindex function name
458
459 In most computer languages, every function has a name; the idea of a
460function without a name is nonsensical. In Lisp, a function in the
461strictest sense has no name. It is simply a list whose first element is
462@code{lambda}, a byte-code function object, or a primitive subr-object.
463
464 However, a symbol can serve as the name of a function. This happens
465when you put the function in the symbol's @dfn{function cell}
466(@pxref{Symbol Components}). Then the symbol itself becomes a valid,
467callable function, equivalent to the list or subr-object that its
468function cell refers to. The contents of the function cell are also
469called the symbol's @dfn{function definition}. The procedure of using a
470symbol's function definition in place of the symbol is called
471@dfn{symbol function indirection}; see @ref{Function Indirection}.
472
473 In practice, nearly all functions are given names in this way and
474referred to through their names. For example, the symbol @code{car} works
475as a function and does what it does because the primitive subr-object
476@code{#<subr car>} is stored in its function cell.
477
478 We give functions names because it is convenient to refer to them by
479their names in Lisp expressions. For primitive subr-objects such as
480@code{#<subr car>}, names are the only way you can refer to them: there
481is no read syntax for such objects. For functions written in Lisp, the
482name is more convenient to use in a call than an explicit lambda
483expression. Also, a function with a name can refer to itself---it can
484be recursive. Writing the function's name in its own definition is much
485more convenient than making the function definition point to itself
486(something that is not impossible but that has various disadvantages in
487practice).
488
489 We often identify functions with the symbols used to name them. For
490example, we often speak of ``the function @code{car},'' not
491distinguishing between the symbol @code{car} and the primitive
492subr-object that is its function definition. For most purposes, the
493distinction is not important.
494
495 Even so, keep in mind that a function need not have a unique name. While
496a given function object @emph{usually} appears in the function cell of only
497one symbol, this is just a matter of convenience. It is easy to store
498it in several symbols using @code{fset}; then each of the symbols is
499equally well a name for the same function.
500
501 A symbol used as a function name may also be used as a variable; these
502two uses of a symbol are independent and do not conflict. (Some Lisp
503dialects, such as Scheme, do not distinguish between a symbol's value
504and its function definition; a symbol's value as a variable is also its
505function definition.) If you have not given a symbol a function
506definition, you cannot use it as a function; whether the symbol has a
507value as a variable makes no difference to this.
508
509@node Defining Functions
510@section Defining Functions
511@cindex defining a function
512
513 We usually give a name to a function when it is first created. This
514is called @dfn{defining a function}, and it is done with the
515@code{defun} special form.
516
517@defspec defun name argument-list body-forms
518@code{defun} is the usual way to define new Lisp functions. It
519defines the symbol @var{name} as a function that looks like this:
520
521@example
522(lambda @var{argument-list} . @var{body-forms})
523@end example
524
525@code{defun} stores this lambda expression in the function cell of
526@var{name}. It returns the value @var{name}, but usually we ignore this
527value.
528
529As described previously, @var{argument-list} is a list of argument
530names and may include the keywords @code{&optional} and @code{&rest}
531(@pxref{Lambda Expressions}). Also, the first two of the
532@var{body-forms} may be a documentation string and an interactive
533declaration.
534
535There is no conflict if the same symbol @var{name} is also used as a
536variable, since the symbol's value cell is independent of the function
537cell. @xref{Symbol Components}.
538
539Here are some examples:
540
541@example
542@group
543(defun foo () 5)
544 @result{} foo
545@end group
546@group
547(foo)
548 @result{} 5
549@end group
550
551@group
552(defun bar (a &optional b &rest c)
553 (list a b c))
554 @result{} bar
555@end group
556@group
557(bar 1 2 3 4 5)
558 @result{} (1 2 (3 4 5))
559@end group
560@group
561(bar 1)
562 @result{} (1 nil nil)
563@end group
564@group
565(bar)
566@error{} Wrong number of arguments.
567@end group
568
569@group
570(defun capitalize-backwards ()
571 "Upcase the last letter of a word."
572 (interactive)
573 (backward-word 1)
574 (forward-word 1)
575 (backward-char 1)
576 (capitalize-word 1))
577 @result{} capitalize-backwards
578@end group
579@end example
580
581Be careful not to redefine existing functions unintentionally.
582@code{defun} redefines even primitive functions such as @code{car}
583without any hesitation or notification. Redefining a function already
584defined is often done deliberately, and there is no way to distinguish
585deliberate redefinition from unintentional redefinition.
586@end defspec
587
588@cindex function aliases
589@defun defalias name definition &optional docstring
590@anchor{Definition of defalias}
591This special form defines the symbol @var{name} as a function, with
592definition @var{definition} (which can be any valid Lisp function).
593It returns @var{definition}.
594
595If @var{docstring} is non-@code{nil}, it becomes the function
596documentation of @var{name}. Otherwise, any documentation provided by
597@var{definition} is used.
598
599The proper place to use @code{defalias} is where a specific function
600name is being defined---especially where that name appears explicitly in
601the source file being loaded. This is because @code{defalias} records
602which file defined the function, just like @code{defun}
603(@pxref{Unloading}).
604
605By contrast, in programs that manipulate function definitions for other
606purposes, it is better to use @code{fset}, which does not keep such
607records. @xref{Function Cells}.
608@end defun
609
610 You cannot create a new primitive function with @code{defun} or
611@code{defalias}, but you can use them to change the function definition of
612any symbol, even one such as @code{car} or @code{x-popup-menu} whose
613normal definition is a primitive. However, this is risky: for
614instance, it is next to impossible to redefine @code{car} without
615breaking Lisp completely. Redefining an obscure function such as
616@code{x-popup-menu} is less dangerous, but it still may not work as
617you expect. If there are calls to the primitive from C code, they
618call the primitive's C definition directly, so changing the symbol's
619definition will have no effect on them.
620
621 See also @code{defsubst}, which defines a function like @code{defun}
622and tells the Lisp compiler to open-code it. @xref{Inline Functions}.
623
624@node Calling Functions
625@section Calling Functions
626@cindex function invocation
627@cindex calling a function
628
629 Defining functions is only half the battle. Functions don't do
630anything until you @dfn{call} them, i.e., tell them to run. Calling a
631function is also known as @dfn{invocation}.
632
633 The most common way of invoking a function is by evaluating a list.
634For example, evaluating the list @code{(concat "a" "b")} calls the
635function @code{concat} with arguments @code{"a"} and @code{"b"}.
636@xref{Evaluation}, for a description of evaluation.
637
638 When you write a list as an expression in your program, you specify
639which function to call, and how many arguments to give it, in the text
640of the program. Usually that's just what you want. Occasionally you
641need to compute at run time which function to call. To do that, use
642the function @code{funcall}. When you also need to determine at run
643time how many arguments to pass, use @code{apply}.
644
645@defun funcall function &rest arguments
646@code{funcall} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, and returns
647whatever @var{function} returns.
648
649Since @code{funcall} is a function, all of its arguments, including
650@var{function}, are evaluated before @code{funcall} is called. This
651means that you can use any expression to obtain the function to be
652called. It also means that @code{funcall} does not see the
653expressions you write for the @var{arguments}, only their values.
654These values are @emph{not} evaluated a second time in the act of
655calling @var{function}; the operation of @code{funcall} is like the
656normal procedure for calling a function, once its arguments have
657already been evaluated.
658
659The argument @var{function} must be either a Lisp function or a
660primitive function. Special forms and macros are not allowed, because
661they make sense only when given the ``unevaluated'' argument
662expressions. @code{funcall} cannot provide these because, as we saw
663above, it never knows them in the first place.
664
665@example
666@group
667(setq f 'list)
668 @result{} list
669@end group
670@group
671(funcall f 'x 'y 'z)
672 @result{} (x y z)
673@end group
674@group
675(funcall f 'x 'y '(z))
676 @result{} (x y (z))
677@end group
678@group
679(funcall 'and t nil)
680@error{} Invalid function: #<subr and>
681@end group
682@end example
683
684Compare these examples with the examples of @code{apply}.
685@end defun
686
687@defun apply function &rest arguments
688@code{apply} calls @var{function} with @var{arguments}, just like
689@code{funcall} but with one difference: the last of @var{arguments} is a
690list of objects, which are passed to @var{function} as separate
691arguments, rather than a single list. We say that @code{apply}
692@dfn{spreads} this list so that each individual element becomes an
693argument.
694
695@code{apply} returns the result of calling @var{function}. As with
696@code{funcall}, @var{function} must either be a Lisp function or a
697primitive function; special forms and macros do not make sense in
698@code{apply}.
699
700@example
701@group
702(setq f 'list)
703 @result{} list
704@end group
705@group
706(apply f 'x 'y 'z)
707@error{} Wrong type argument: listp, z
708@end group
709@group
710(apply '+ 1 2 '(3 4))
711 @result{} 10
712@end group
713@group
714(apply '+ '(1 2 3 4))
715 @result{} 10
716@end group
717
718@group
719(apply 'append '((a b c) nil (x y z) nil))
720 @result{} (a b c x y z)
721@end group
722@end example
723
724For an interesting example of using @code{apply}, see @ref{Definition
725of mapcar}.
726@end defun
727
80f85d7c
EZ
728@cindex partial application of functions
729@cindex currying
a18a6d49 730 Sometimes it is useful to fix some of the function's arguments at
80f85d7c
EZ
731certain values, and leave the rest of arguments for when the function
732is actually called. The act of fixing some of the function's
733arguments is called @dfn{partial application} of the function@footnote{
734This is related to, but different from @dfn{currying}, which
735transforms a function that takes multiple arguments in such a way that
736it can be called as a chain of functions, each one with a single
737argument.}.
738The result is a new function that accepts the rest of
739arguments and calls the original function with all the arguments
a18a6d49
EZ
740combined.
741
742 Here's how to do partial application in Emacs Lisp:
80f85d7c
EZ
743
744@defun apply-partially func &rest args
745This function returns a new function which, when called, will call
746@var{func} with the list of arguments composed from @var{args} and
747additional arguments specified at the time of the call. If @var{func}
748accepts @var{n} arguments, then a call to @code{apply-partially} with
749@w{@code{@var{m} < @var{n}}} arguments will produce a new function of
750@w{@code{@var{n} - @var{m}}} arguments.
751
834b5485
EZ
752Here's how we could define the built-in function @code{1+}, if it
753didn't exist, using @code{apply-partially} and @code{+}, another
754built-in function:
80f85d7c
EZ
755
756@example
80f85d7c 757@group
834b5485
EZ
758(defalias '1+ (apply-partially '+ 1)
759 "Increment argument by one.")
760@end group
761@group
762(1+ 10)
80f85d7c
EZ
763 @result{} 11
764@end group
765@end example
766@end defun
767
b8d4c8d0
GM
768@cindex functionals
769 It is common for Lisp functions to accept functions as arguments or
770find them in data structures (especially in hook variables and property
771lists) and call them using @code{funcall} or @code{apply}. Functions
772that accept function arguments are often called @dfn{functionals}.
773
774 Sometimes, when you call a functional, it is useful to supply a no-op
775function as the argument. Here are two different kinds of no-op
776function:
777
778@defun identity arg
779This function returns @var{arg} and has no side effects.
780@end defun
781
782@defun ignore &rest args
783This function ignores any arguments and returns @code{nil}.
784@end defun
785
786@node Mapping Functions
787@section Mapping Functions
788@cindex mapping functions
789
790 A @dfn{mapping function} applies a given function (@emph{not} a
791special form or macro) to each element of a list or other collection.
792Emacs Lisp has several such functions; @code{mapcar} and
793@code{mapconcat}, which scan a list, are described here.
794@xref{Definition of mapatoms}, for the function @code{mapatoms} which
795maps over the symbols in an obarray. @xref{Definition of maphash},
796for the function @code{maphash} which maps over key/value associations
797in a hash table.
798
799 These mapping functions do not allow char-tables because a char-table
800is a sparse array whose nominal range of indices is very large. To map
801over a char-table in a way that deals properly with its sparse nature,
802use the function @code{map-char-table} (@pxref{Char-Tables}).
803
804@defun mapcar function sequence
805@anchor{Definition of mapcar}
806@code{mapcar} applies @var{function} to each element of @var{sequence}
807in turn, and returns a list of the results.
808
809The argument @var{sequence} can be any kind of sequence except a
810char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a bool-vector, or a string. The
811result is always a list. The length of the result is the same as the
812length of @var{sequence}. For example:
813
814@smallexample
815@group
816(mapcar 'car '((a b) (c d) (e f)))
817 @result{} (a c e)
818(mapcar '1+ [1 2 3])
819 @result{} (2 3 4)
3e99b825 820(mapcar 'string "abc")
b8d4c8d0
GM
821 @result{} ("a" "b" "c")
822@end group
823
824@group
825;; @r{Call each function in @code{my-hooks}.}
826(mapcar 'funcall my-hooks)
827@end group
828
829@group
830(defun mapcar* (function &rest args)
831 "Apply FUNCTION to successive cars of all ARGS.
832Return the list of results."
833 ;; @r{If no list is exhausted,}
834 (if (not (memq nil args))
835 ;; @r{apply function to @sc{car}s.}
836 (cons (apply function (mapcar 'car args))
837 (apply 'mapcar* function
838 ;; @r{Recurse for rest of elements.}
839 (mapcar 'cdr args)))))
840@end group
841
842@group
843(mapcar* 'cons '(a b c) '(1 2 3 4))
844 @result{} ((a . 1) (b . 2) (c . 3))
845@end group
846@end smallexample
847@end defun
848
849@defun mapc function sequence
850@code{mapc} is like @code{mapcar} except that @var{function} is used for
851side-effects only---the values it returns are ignored, not collected
852into a list. @code{mapc} always returns @var{sequence}.
853@end defun
854
855@defun mapconcat function sequence separator
856@code{mapconcat} applies @var{function} to each element of
857@var{sequence}: the results, which must be strings, are concatenated.
858Between each pair of result strings, @code{mapconcat} inserts the string
859@var{separator}. Usually @var{separator} contains a space or comma or
860other suitable punctuation.
861
862The argument @var{function} must be a function that can take one
863argument and return a string. The argument @var{sequence} can be any
864kind of sequence except a char-table; that is, a list, a vector, a
865bool-vector, or a string.
866
867@smallexample
868@group
869(mapconcat 'symbol-name
870 '(The cat in the hat)
871 " ")
872 @result{} "The cat in the hat"
873@end group
874
875@group
876(mapconcat (function (lambda (x) (format "%c" (1+ x))))
877 "HAL-8000"
878 "")
879 @result{} "IBM.9111"
880@end group
881@end smallexample
882@end defun
883
884@node Anonymous Functions
885@section Anonymous Functions
886@cindex anonymous function
887
888 In Lisp, a function is a list that starts with @code{lambda}, a
889byte-code function compiled from such a list, or alternatively a
5d6ab672
CY
890primitive subr-object; names are ``extra.'' Although functions are
891usually defined with @code{defun} and given names at the same time, it
892is occasionally more concise to use an explicit lambda expression---an
b8d4c8d0
GM
893anonymous function. Such a list is valid wherever a function name is.
894
895 Any method of creating such a list makes a valid function. Even this:
896
897@smallexample
898@group
899(setq silly (append '(lambda (x)) (list (list '+ (* 3 4) 'x))))
900@result{} (lambda (x) (+ 12 x))
901@end group
902@end smallexample
903
904@noindent
905This computes a list that looks like @code{(lambda (x) (+ 12 x))} and
906makes it the value (@emph{not} the function definition!) of
907@code{silly}.
908
909 Here is how we might call this function:
910
911@example
912@group
913(funcall silly 1)
914@result{} 13
915@end group
916@end example
917
918@noindent
5d6ab672
CY
919It does @emph{not} work to write @code{(silly 1)}, because this
920function is not the @emph{function definition} of @code{silly}. We
921have not given @code{silly} any function definition, just a value as a
922variable.
b8d4c8d0
GM
923
924 Most of the time, anonymous functions are constants that appear in
5d6ab672
CY
925your program. For instance, you might want to pass one as an argument
926to the function @code{mapcar}, which applies any given function to
927each element of a list (@pxref{Mapping Functions}).
928@xref{describe-symbols example}, for a realistic example of this.
b8d4c8d0 929
5d6ab672
CY
930 In the following example, we define a @code{change-property}
931function that takes a function as its third argument, followed by a
932@code{double-property} function that makes use of
933@code{change-property} by passing it an anonymous function:
b8d4c8d0
GM
934
935@example
936@group
937(defun change-property (symbol prop function)
938 (let ((value (get symbol prop)))
939 (put symbol prop (funcall function value))))
940@end group
b8d4c8d0 941
b8d4c8d0
GM
942@group
943(defun double-property (symbol prop)
5d6ab672 944 (change-property symbol prop (lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
b8d4c8d0
GM
945@end group
946@end example
947
b8d4c8d0 948@noindent
5d6ab672
CY
949In the @code{double-property} function, we did not quote the
950@code{lambda} form. This is permissible, because a @code{lambda} form
951is @dfn{self-quoting}: evaluating the form yields the form itself.
b8d4c8d0 952
5d6ab672
CY
953Whether or not you quote a @code{lambda} form makes a difference if
954you compile the code (@pxref{Byte Compilation}). If the @code{lambda}
955form is unquoted, as in the above example, the anonymous function is
956also compiled. Suppose, however, that we quoted the @code{lambda}
957form:
b8d4c8d0
GM
958
959@example
960@group
961(defun double-property (symbol prop)
5d6ab672 962 (change-property symbol prop '(lambda (x) (* 2 x))))
b8d4c8d0
GM
963@end group
964@end example
965
966@noindent
5d6ab672
CY
967If you compile this, the argument passed to @code{change-property} is
968the precise list shown:
b8d4c8d0
GM
969
970@example
5d6ab672 971(lambda (x) (* x 2))
b8d4c8d0
GM
972@end example
973
974@noindent
5d6ab672
CY
975The Lisp compiler cannot assume this list is a function, even though
976it looks like one, since it does not know what @code{change-property}
977will do with the list. Perhaps it will check whether the @sc{car} of
978the third element is the symbol @code{*}!
b8d4c8d0 979
5d6ab672
CY
980@findex function
981The @code{function} special form explicitly tells the byte-compiler
982that its argument is a function:
b8d4c8d0
GM
983
984@defspec function function-object
985@cindex function quoting
986This special form returns @var{function-object} without evaluating it.
987In this, it is equivalent to @code{quote}. However, it serves as a
988note to the Emacs Lisp compiler that @var{function-object} is intended
989to be used only as a function, and therefore can safely be compiled.
990Contrast this with @code{quote}, in @ref{Quoting}.
991@end defspec
992
5d6ab672
CY
993@cindex @samp{#'} syntax
994The read syntax @code{#'} is a short-hand for using @code{function}.
995Generally, it is not necessary to use either @code{#'} or
996@code{function}; just use an unquoted @code{lambda} form instead.
997(Actually, @code{lambda} is a macro defined using @code{function}.)
998The following forms are all equivalent:
999
1000@example
1001#'(lambda (x) (* x x))
1002(function (lambda (x) (* x x)))
1003(lambda (x) (* x x))
1004@end example
1005
1006 We sometimes write @code{function} instead of @code{quote} when
1007quoting the name of a function, but this usage is just a sort of
1008comment:
1009
1010@example
1011(function @var{symbol}) @equiv{} (quote @var{symbol}) @equiv{} '@var{symbol}
1012@end example
b8d4c8d0
GM
1013
1014@node Function Cells
1015@section Accessing Function Cell Contents
1016
1017 The @dfn{function definition} of a symbol is the object stored in the
1018function cell of the symbol. The functions described here access, test,
1019and set the function cell of symbols.
1020
1021 See also the function @code{indirect-function}. @xref{Definition of
1022indirect-function}.
1023
1024@defun symbol-function symbol
1025@kindex void-function
1026This returns the object in the function cell of @var{symbol}. If the
1027symbol's function cell is void, a @code{void-function} error is
1028signaled.
1029
1030This function does not check that the returned object is a legitimate
1031function.
1032
1033@example
1034@group
1035(defun bar (n) (+ n 2))
1036 @result{} bar
1037@end group
1038@group
1039(symbol-function 'bar)
1040 @result{} (lambda (n) (+ n 2))
1041@end group
1042@group
1043(fset 'baz 'bar)
1044 @result{} bar
1045@end group
1046@group
1047(symbol-function 'baz)
1048 @result{} bar
1049@end group
1050@end example
1051@end defun
1052
1053@cindex void function cell
1054 If you have never given a symbol any function definition, we say that
1055that symbol's function cell is @dfn{void}. In other words, the function
1056cell does not have any Lisp object in it. If you try to call such a symbol
1057as a function, it signals a @code{void-function} error.
1058
1059 Note that void is not the same as @code{nil} or the symbol
1060@code{void}. The symbols @code{nil} and @code{void} are Lisp objects,
1061and can be stored into a function cell just as any other object can be
1062(and they can be valid functions if you define them in turn with
1063@code{defun}). A void function cell contains no object whatsoever.
1064
1065 You can test the voidness of a symbol's function definition with
1066@code{fboundp}. After you have given a symbol a function definition, you
1067can make it void once more using @code{fmakunbound}.
1068
1069@defun fboundp symbol
1070This function returns @code{t} if the symbol has an object in its
1071function cell, @code{nil} otherwise. It does not check that the object
1072is a legitimate function.
1073@end defun
1074
1075@defun fmakunbound symbol
1076This function makes @var{symbol}'s function cell void, so that a
1077subsequent attempt to access this cell will cause a
1078@code{void-function} error. It returns @var{symbol}. (See also
1079@code{makunbound}, in @ref{Void Variables}.)
1080
1081@example
1082@group
1083(defun foo (x) x)
1084 @result{} foo
1085@end group
1086@group
1087(foo 1)
1088 @result{}1
1089@end group
1090@group
1091(fmakunbound 'foo)
1092 @result{} foo
1093@end group
1094@group
1095(foo 1)
1096@error{} Symbol's function definition is void: foo
1097@end group
1098@end example
1099@end defun
1100
1101@defun fset symbol definition
1102This function stores @var{definition} in the function cell of
1103@var{symbol}. The result is @var{definition}. Normally
1104@var{definition} should be a function or the name of a function, but
1105this is not checked. The argument @var{symbol} is an ordinary evaluated
1106argument.
1107
1108There are three normal uses of this function:
1109
1110@itemize @bullet
1111@item
1112Copying one symbol's function definition to another---in other words,
1113making an alternate name for a function. (If you think of this as the
1114definition of the new name, you should use @code{defalias} instead of
1115@code{fset}; see @ref{Definition of defalias}.)
1116
1117@item
1118Giving a symbol a function definition that is not a list and therefore
1119cannot be made with @code{defun}. For example, you can use @code{fset}
1120to give a symbol @code{s1} a function definition which is another symbol
1121@code{s2}; then @code{s1} serves as an alias for whatever definition
1122@code{s2} presently has. (Once again use @code{defalias} instead of
1123@code{fset} if you think of this as the definition of @code{s1}.)
1124
1125@item
1126In constructs for defining or altering functions. If @code{defun}
1127were not a primitive, it could be written in Lisp (as a macro) using
1128@code{fset}.
1129@end itemize
1130
1131Here are examples of these uses:
1132
1133@example
1134@group
1135;; @r{Save @code{foo}'s definition in @code{old-foo}.}
1136(fset 'old-foo (symbol-function 'foo))
1137@end group
1138
1139@group
1140;; @r{Make the symbol @code{car} the function definition of @code{xfirst}.}
1141;; @r{(Most likely, @code{defalias} would be better than @code{fset} here.)}
1142(fset 'xfirst 'car)
1143 @result{} car
1144@end group
1145@group
1146(xfirst '(1 2 3))
1147 @result{} 1
1148@end group
1149@group
1150(symbol-function 'xfirst)
1151 @result{} car
1152@end group
1153@group
1154(symbol-function (symbol-function 'xfirst))
1155 @result{} #<subr car>
1156@end group
1157
1158@group
1159;; @r{Define a named keyboard macro.}
1160(fset 'kill-two-lines "\^u2\^k")
1161 @result{} "\^u2\^k"
1162@end group
1163
1164@group
1165;; @r{Here is a function that alters other functions.}
1166(defun copy-function-definition (new old)
1167 "Define NEW with the same function definition as OLD."
1168 (fset new (symbol-function old)))
1169@end group
1170@end example
1171@end defun
1172
1173 @code{fset} is sometimes used to save the old definition of a
1174function before redefining it. That permits the new definition to
1175invoke the old definition. But it is unmodular and unclean for a Lisp
1176file to redefine a function defined elsewhere. If you want to modify
1177a function defined by another package, it is cleaner to use
1178@code{defadvice} (@pxref{Advising Functions}).
1179
1180@node Obsolete Functions
1181@section Declaring Functions Obsolete
1182
1183You can use @code{make-obsolete} to declare a function obsolete. This
1184indicates that the function may be removed at some stage in the future.
1185
1186@defun make-obsolete obsolete-name current-name &optional when
1187This function makes the byte compiler warn that the function
1188@var{obsolete-name} is obsolete. If @var{current-name} is a symbol, the
1189warning message says to use @var{current-name} instead of
1190@var{obsolete-name}. @var{current-name} does not need to be an alias for
1191@var{obsolete-name}; it can be a different function with similar
1192functionality. If @var{current-name} is a string, it is the warning
1193message.
1194
1195If provided, @var{when} should be a string indicating when the function
1196was first made obsolete---for example, a date or a release number.
1197@end defun
1198
1199You can define a function as an alias and declare it obsolete at the
eb5ed549 1200same time using the macro @code{define-obsolete-function-alias}:
b8d4c8d0
GM
1201
1202@defmac define-obsolete-function-alias obsolete-name current-name &optional when docstring
1203This macro marks the function @var{obsolete-name} obsolete and also
1204defines it as an alias for the function @var{current-name}. It is
1205equivalent to the following:
1206
1207@example
1208(defalias @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{docstring})
1209(make-obsolete @var{obsolete-name} @var{current-name} @var{when})
1210@end example
1211@end defmac
1212
eb5ed549
CY
1213In addition, you can mark a certain a particular calling convention
1214for a function as obsolete:
1215
1216@defun set-advertised-calling-convention function signature
1217This function specifies the argument list @var{signature} as the
1218correct way to call @var{function}. This causes the Emacs byte
1219compiler to issue a warning whenever it comes across an Emacs Lisp
1220program that calls @var{function} any other way (however, it will
1221still allow the code to be byte compiled).
1222
1223For instance, in old versions of Emacs the @code{sit-for} function
1224accepted three arguments, like this
1225
1226@smallexample
1227 (sit-for seconds milliseconds nodisp)
1228@end smallexample
1229
1230However, calling @code{sit-for} this way is considered obsolete
1231(@pxref{Waiting}). The old calling convention is deprecated like
1232this:
1233
1234@smallexample
1235(set-advertised-calling-convention
1236 'sit-for '(seconds &optional nodisp))
1237@end smallexample
1238@end defun
1239
b8d4c8d0
GM
1240@node Inline Functions
1241@section Inline Functions
1242@cindex inline functions
1243
1244@findex defsubst
1245You can define an @dfn{inline function} by using @code{defsubst} instead
1246of @code{defun}. An inline function works just like an ordinary
1247function except for one thing: when you compile a call to the function,
1248the function's definition is open-coded into the caller.
1249
1250Making a function inline makes explicit calls run faster. But it also
1251has disadvantages. For one thing, it reduces flexibility; if you
1252change the definition of the function, calls already inlined still use
1253the old definition until you recompile them.
1254
1255Another disadvantage is that making a large function inline can increase
1256the size of compiled code both in files and in memory. Since the speed
1257advantage of inline functions is greatest for small functions, you
1258generally should not make large functions inline.
1259
1260Also, inline functions do not behave well with respect to debugging,
1261tracing, and advising (@pxref{Advising Functions}). Since ease of
1262debugging and the flexibility of redefining functions are important
1263features of Emacs, you should not make a function inline, even if it's
1264small, unless its speed is really crucial, and you've timed the code
1265to verify that using @code{defun} actually has performance problems.
1266
1267It's possible to define a macro to expand into the same code that an
1268inline function would execute. (@xref{Macros}.) But the macro would be
1269limited to direct use in expressions---a macro cannot be called with
1270@code{apply}, @code{mapcar} and so on. Also, it takes some work to
1271convert an ordinary function into a macro. To convert it into an inline
1272function is very easy; simply replace @code{defun} with @code{defsubst}.
1273Since each argument of an inline function is evaluated exactly once, you
1274needn't worry about how many times the body uses the arguments, as you
1275do for macros. (@xref{Argument Evaluation}.)
1276
1277Inline functions can be used and open-coded later on in the same file,
1278following the definition, just like macros.
1279
e31dfb12
GM
1280@node Declaring Functions
1281@section Telling the Compiler that a Function is Defined
1282@cindex function declaration
1283@cindex declaring functions
c4540067 1284@findex declare-function
e31dfb12 1285
a0925923
RS
1286Byte-compiling a file often produces warnings about functions that the
1287compiler doesn't know about (@pxref{Compiler Errors}). Sometimes this
1288indicates a real problem, but usually the functions in question are
1289defined in other files which would be loaded if that code is run. For
1290example, byte-compiling @file{fortran.el} used to warn:
e31dfb12 1291
a0925923 1292@smallexample
e31dfb12 1293In end of data:
bfd0fe7b
GM
1294fortran.el:2152:1:Warning: the function `gud-find-c-expr' is not known
1295 to be defined.
a0925923 1296@end smallexample
e31dfb12 1297
a0925923
RS
1298In fact, @code{gud-find-c-expr} is only used in the function that
1299Fortran mode uses for the local value of
1300@code{gud-find-expr-function}, which is a callback from GUD; if it is
1301called, the GUD functions will be loaded. When you know that such a
1302warning does not indicate a real problem, it is good to suppress the
1303warning. That makes new warnings which might mean real problems more
1304visible. You do that with @code{declare-function}.
e31dfb12
GM
1305
1306All you need to do is add a @code{declare-function} statement before the
1307first use of the function in question:
1308
a0925923 1309@smallexample
e31dfb12 1310(declare-function gud-find-c-expr "gud.el" nil)
7a6a1728 1311@end smallexample
e31dfb12
GM
1312
1313This says that @code{gud-find-c-expr} is defined in @file{gud.el} (the
a0925923
RS
1314@samp{.el} can be omitted). The compiler takes for granted that that file
1315really defines the function, and does not check.
7a6a1728 1316
a0925923
RS
1317 The optional third argument specifies the argument list of
1318@code{gud-find-c-expr}. In this case, it takes no arguments
1319(@code{nil} is different from not specifying a value). In other
1320cases, this might be something like @code{(file &optional overwrite)}.
1321You don't have to specify the argument list, but if you do the
1322byte compiler can check that the calls match the declaration.
1323
8f4b37d8 1324@defmac declare-function function file &optional arglist fileonly
a0925923 1325Tell the byte compiler to assume that @var{function} is defined, with
b0fbc500
CY
1326arguments @var{arglist}, and that the definition should come from the
1327file @var{file}. @var{fileonly} non-@code{nil} means only check that
8f4b37d8 1328@var{file} exists, not that it actually defines @var{function}.
a0925923
RS
1329@end defmac
1330
1331 To verify that these functions really are declared where
1332@code{declare-function} says they are, use @code{check-declare-file}
1333to check all @code{declare-function} calls in one source file, or use
1334@code{check-declare-directory} check all the files in and under a
1335certain directory.
1336
1337 These commands find the file that ought to contain a function's
1338definition using @code{locate-library}; if that finds no file, they
1339expand the definition file name relative to the directory of the file
1340that contains the @code{declare-function} call.
1341
3d9842c6
GM
1342 You can also say that a function is defined by C code by specifying a
1343file name ending in @samp{.c} or @samp{.m}. @code{check-declare-file}
1344looks for these files in the C source code directory. This is useful
1345only when you call a function that is defined only on certain systems.
1346Most of the primitive functions of Emacs are always defined so they will
a0925923 1347never give you a warning.
e31dfb12 1348
c4540067
GM
1349 Sometimes a file will optionally use functions from an external package.
1350If you prefix the filename in the @code{declare-function} statement with
1351@samp{ext:}, then it will be checked if it is found, otherwise skipped
1352without error.
1353
8f4b37d8
GM
1354 There are some function definitions that @samp{check-declare} does not
1355understand (e.g. @code{defstruct} and some other macros). In such cases,
6297397b
GM
1356you can pass a non-@code{nil} @var{fileonly} argument to
1357@code{declare-function}, meaning to only check that the file exists, not
1358that it actually defines the function. Note that to do this without
1359having to specify an argument list, you should set the @var{arglist}
1360argument to @code{t} (because @code{nil} means an empty argument list, as
1361opposed to an unspecified one).
8f4b37d8 1362
b8d4c8d0
GM
1363@node Function Safety
1364@section Determining whether a Function is Safe to Call
1365@cindex function safety
1366@cindex safety of functions
1367
1368Some major modes such as SES call functions that are stored in user
1369files. (@inforef{Top, ,ses}, for more information on SES.) User
1370files sometimes have poor pedigrees---you can get a spreadsheet from
1371someone you've just met, or you can get one through email from someone
1372you've never met. So it is risky to call a function whose source code
1373is stored in a user file until you have determined that it is safe.
1374
1375@defun unsafep form &optional unsafep-vars
1376Returns @code{nil} if @var{form} is a @dfn{safe} Lisp expression, or
1377returns a list that describes why it might be unsafe. The argument
1378@var{unsafep-vars} is a list of symbols known to have temporary
1379bindings at this point; it is mainly used for internal recursive
1380calls. The current buffer is an implicit argument, which provides a
1381list of buffer-local bindings.
1382@end defun
1383
1384Being quick and simple, @code{unsafep} does a very light analysis and
1385rejects many Lisp expressions that are actually safe. There are no
1386known cases where @code{unsafep} returns @code{nil} for an unsafe
1387expression. However, a ``safe'' Lisp expression can return a string
1388with a @code{display} property, containing an associated Lisp
1389expression to be executed after the string is inserted into a buffer.
1390This associated expression can be a virus. In order to be safe, you
1391must delete properties from all strings calculated by user code before
1392inserting them into buffers.
1393
1394@ignore
1395What is a safe Lisp expression? Basically, it's an expression that
1396calls only built-in functions with no side effects (or only innocuous
1397ones). Innocuous side effects include displaying messages and
1398altering non-risky buffer-local variables (but not global variables).
1399
1400@table @dfn
1401@item Safe expression
1402@itemize
1403@item
1404An atom or quoted thing.
1405@item
1406A call to a safe function (see below), if all its arguments are
1407safe expressions.
1408@item
1409One of the special forms @code{and}, @code{catch}, @code{cond},
1410@code{if}, @code{or}, @code{prog1}, @code{prog2}, @code{progn},
1411@code{while}, and @code{unwind-protect}], if all its arguments are
1412safe.
1413@item
1414A form that creates temporary bindings (@code{condition-case},
1415@code{dolist}, @code{dotimes}, @code{lambda}, @code{let}, or
1416@code{let*}), if all args are safe and the symbols to be bound are not
1417explicitly risky (see @pxref{File Local Variables}).
1418@item
1419An assignment using @code{add-to-list}, @code{setq}, @code{push}, or
1420@code{pop}, if all args are safe and the symbols to be assigned are
1421not explicitly risky and they already have temporary or buffer-local
1422bindings.
1423@item
1424One of [apply, mapc, mapcar, mapconcat] if the first argument is a
1425safe explicit lambda and the other args are safe expressions.
1426@end itemize
1427
1428@item Safe function
1429@itemize
1430@item
1431A lambda containing safe expressions.
1432@item
1433A symbol on the list @code{safe-functions}, so the user says it's safe.
1434@item
1435A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{side-effect-free} property.
1436@item
27610f35
RS
1437A symbol with a non-@code{nil} @code{safe-function} property. The
1438value @code{t} indicates a function that is safe but has innocuous
1439side effects. Other values will someday indicate functions with
1440classes of side effects that are not always safe.
b8d4c8d0
GM
1441@end itemize
1442
1443The @code{side-effect-free} and @code{safe-function} properties are
1444provided for built-in functions and for low-level functions and macros
1445defined in @file{subr.el}. You can assign these properties for the
1446functions you write.
1447@end table
1448@end ignore
1449
1450@node Related Topics
1451@section Other Topics Related to Functions
1452
1453 Here is a table of several functions that do things related to
1454function calling and function definitions. They are documented
1455elsewhere, but we provide cross references here.
1456
1457@table @code
1458@item apply
1459See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1460
1461@item autoload
1462See @ref{Autoload}.
1463
1464@item call-interactively
1465See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1466
39dc0d57
RS
1467@item called-interactively-p
1468See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
1469
b8d4c8d0
GM
1470@item commandp
1471See @ref{Interactive Call}.
1472
1473@item documentation
1474See @ref{Accessing Documentation}.
1475
1476@item eval
1477See @ref{Eval}.
1478
1479@item funcall
1480See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1481
1482@item function
1483See @ref{Anonymous Functions}.
1484
1485@item ignore
1486See @ref{Calling Functions}.
1487
1488@item indirect-function
1489See @ref{Function Indirection}.
1490
1491@item interactive
1492See @ref{Using Interactive}.
1493
1494@item interactive-p
39dc0d57 1495See @ref{Distinguish Interactive}.
b8d4c8d0
GM
1496
1497@item mapatoms
1498See @ref{Creating Symbols}.
1499
1500@item mapcar
1501See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1502
1503@item map-char-table
1504See @ref{Char-Tables}.
1505
1506@item mapconcat
1507See @ref{Mapping Functions}.
1508
1509@item undefined
1510See @ref{Functions for Key Lookup}.
1511@end table