Removed for legal reasons.
[bpt/emacs.git] / admin / notes / copyright
CommitLineData
571975c0
GM
1NOTES ON COPYRIGHTS AND LICENSES
2
3Some terminology:
4
5A "copyright notice" consists of one or a few lines of this format:
6"Copyright (C) 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc."
7
8A "license notice" is a statement of permissions, and is usually much
9longer, eg the text "GNU Emacs is free software...".
10
11
12Every non-trivial file distributed through the Emacs CVS should be
13self-explanatory in terms of copyright and license. This includes
14files that are not distributed in Emacs releases (for example, the
15admin/ directory), because the whole Emacs CVS is publicly
16available.
17
18The definition of triviality is a little vague, but a rule of thumb is
19that any file with less than 15 lines of actual content is trivial. If
20a file is auto-generated (eg ldefs-boot.el) from another one in the
21CVS, then it does not really matter about adding a copyright statement
22to the generated file.
23
24The years in the copyright notice should be updated every year (see
25file "years" in this directory). The PS versions of refcards etc
26should display copyright notices (an exception to the rule about
27"generated" files), but these can just display the latest year. The
28full list of years should be kept in comments in the source file. If
29these are distributed in CVS, check in a regenerated version when the
30tex files are updated.
31
32Copyright changes should be propagated to any associated repositories
33(eg Gnus, MH-E), but I think in every case this happens automatically
34(?).
35
36All README (and other such text files) that are non-trivial and were
37added by Emacs developers need copyright and copying permission
38statements (see eg INSTALL in the top-level directory).
39
40All images files that allow for comments should have copyright and
41license statements. Whether or not this is possible, the information
42should be recorded in a README file in each directory with images.
43
44When installing a file with an "unusual" license (after checking first
45it is ok), put a copy of the copyright and license in the file (if
46possible. It's ok if this makes the file incompatible with its
47original format, if it can still be used by Emacs), or in a README
48file in the relevant directory.
49
50The vast majority of files are copyright FSF and distributed under the
51GPL. A few files (mainly related to language and charset support) are
52copyright AIST alone, or both AIST and FSF. (Contact Kenichi Handa
53with questions about legal issues in such files.) In all these cases,
54the copyright years in each file should be updated each year.
55
56There are some exceptions to the points in the previous paragraph, and
57these are listed below for reference, together with any files where
58the copyright needs to be updated in "unusual" ways.
59
60If you find any other such cases, please consult to check they are ok,
61and note them in this file. This includes missing copyright notices,
62and "odd" copyright holders. In most cases, individual authors should
63not appear in copyright statements. Either the copyright has been
64assigned (check copyright.list) to the FSF (in which case the original
65author should be removed and the year(s) transferred to the FSF); or
66else it is possible the file should not be in Emacs at all (please
67report!).
68
69[For reference, most of these points were established via email with
70rms, 2007/1, "Copyright years".]
71
72
73<top-level>/install-sh
74lispintro/install-sh
75 - this file is copyright MIT, which is OK. Leave the copyright alone.
76
77etc/edt-user.doc
78 - update BOTH notices in this file
79
80leim/CXTERM-DIC/4Corner.tit, ARRAY30.tit, [CCDOSPY.tit], ECDICT.tit,
81ETZY.tit, [PY-b5.tit], Punct-b5.tit, Punct.tit, QJ-b5.tit, QJ.tit,
82[SW.tit, TONEPY.tit,] ZOZY.tit
83 - leave the copyrights alone.
84
85leim/MISC-DIC/CTLau-b5.html, CTLau.html, cangjie-table.b5, cangjie-table.cns,
86[pinyin.map, ziranma.cin]
87 - leave the copyright alone.
88
89leim/SKK-DIC/SKK-JISYO.L
90ja-dic/ja-dic.el
91 (the latter is auto-generated from the former). Leave the copyright alone.
92
93lib-src/etags.c
94 - this has a copyright Ken Arnold. We are still deciding what should
95 be done here (see below).
96
97lib-src/getopt1.c, getopt_int.h
98 - these are from the GNU C library. Leave the copyrights alone.
99
1fbfb0b5
GM
100lisp/play/tetris.el
101 - no special rules about the copyright. We note here that we believe
102 (2007/1) there is no problem with our use of the name "tetris" or
103 the concept.
104 rms: "My understanding is that game rules as such are not copyrightable."
105 <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2007-01/msg00960.html>
106
571975c0
GM
107lispref/doclicense.texi
108man/doclicense.texi
109 - leave the copyright alone in this imported file.
110
111lisp/net/tramp.el
112 - there are also copyrights in the body of the file. Update these too.
113
114msdos/is_exec.c, sigaction.c
115 - these files are copyright DJ Delorie. Leave the copyrights alone.
116
117src/gmalloc.c
118 - contains numerous copyrights from the GNU C library. Leave them alone.
119
120
121*** These are copyright issues still to be addressed:
122
123
124All README (and other such files) that are non-trivial and were added
125by Emacs developers need copyright statements and copying permissions
126to be added.
127
128
129All images files that allow for comments should have copyright and
130license statements added. Whether or not this is possible, the
131information should be recorded in a README file in each directory with
132images.
133
134
135admin/check-doc-strings
136 Author is Martin Buchholz, but no assignment from him on file, and
137 rms has no way to reach him.
138admin/make-announcement - no copyright
139admin/nt/makedist.bat - no copyright
140etc/ms-kermit - no copyright, but ms-7bkermit has one
141etc/e/eterm-color.ti - no copyright
142 rms: "I think that is not copyrightable under the merger doctrine
143 because the entries are all forced. At least that is the case in the
144 US; I am not sure whether we can rely on that in general."
145
146For the above files, mail sent froam rms to Matthew (Martin?) Norwood
147asking what to do (via Eben Moglen), 2007/1/22 ("Copyright years").
148
149
150etc/gnus-refcard.tex
151 I (rgm) think the "Gnus Bugfixing Girls + Boys" copyright should
152 probably be removed, but it may be ok (waiting for rms)
153
154
155etc/orgcard.tex - no Rooke in copyright.list
156 rms will talk with Org mode author about this.
157
158
159etc/sk-refcard.ps, pl-refcard.ps, cs-refcard.ps
160These refcards need to be regenerated (by those with suitable TeX
161setups) to get updated copyrights.
162
163
164leim/CXTERM-DIC/CCDOSPY.tit, PY-b5.tit, SW.tit, TONEPY.tit
165leim/MISC-DIC/pinyin.map, ziranma.cin
166 The copyright and license is stated in the README file, but we may as
167 well copy them into the files themselves (possibly at the expense of
168 making them incompatible with their original formats, but they will
169 still be usable by Emacs). [Kenichi Handa]
170
171
172lib-src/etags.c - no 'k.* arnold' in copyright.list'
173 rms: "That is ok, in principle. I used free code released by Ken
174 Arnold as the starting point. However, it may be that we need to get
175 and insert whatever his license was for his code."
176
177
d94114b2
GM
178lispref/back.texi, elisp-covers.texi, lay-flat.texi,
179two-volume-cross-refs.txt, two.el
180 - add standard notices to any decided to be non-trivial.
181
182
571975c0
GM
183lwlib/lwlib-int.h, lwlib.h - no copyright
184lwlib/Makefile.in, lwlib-utils.c, lwlib.c - copyright Lucid
185lwlib/lwlib-Xaw.c - copyright Chuck Thompson
186lwlib/lwlib.c - copyright Lucid, but FSF copyright was added in 2002 -
187 was that correct?
188 rms: "I asked Matthew Norwood about these, I believe."
189
190
d94114b2
GM
191man/back.texi, trampver.texi
192 - add standard notices to any decided to be non-trivial.
193
194
571975c0
GM
195msdos/
196 - do we need to add COPYING.LIB (because COPYING.DJ refers to it)?
197
198
199oldXMenu/
200 - should there be any FSF copyrights at all in here? Some were added
201 in 2005, without licence notices. Was this right?
202oldXMenu/Makefile.in, Makefile, Imakefile, descrip.mms, insque.c
203 - issues described in mail to rms, 2006/12/17.
204rms: "I have asked for lawyer's advice about these."
205
206
207src/acldef.h, chpdef.h, gnu.h, ndir.h
208src/m/mips4.h, news-r6.h, news-risc.h, pmax.h
209src/s/aix3-2.h, bsd386.h, hpux8.h, hpux9.h, irix4-0.h, irix5-0.h,
210isc2-2.h, netbsd.h, osf1.h, sol2-3.h, sunos4-0.h, umips.h, usg5-4-2.h
211 - all these (not obviously trivial) files are missing copyrights.
212 rms: "I should talk about these with Matthew Norwood."