ee25310d |
1 | The planning of a new system architecture at Hcoop, Inc. is motivated by a set of concerns with the current infrastructure. This page details these concerns in order to improve ourselves in Hcoop, Inc. v. 2.\r |
2 | \r |
3 | = What deficiencies in our current set-up do we want to correct? =\r |
4 | \r |
5 | * If one machine goes down, then our services will go down, too.\r |
6 | * No way for members to buy arbitrary amounts of disk space\r |
7 | * No automated off-machine backups\r |
8 | * ''Until we get new machine(s) set up, would it be possible to rsync the server contents off-site? I would be willing to contribute space on my linux workstation to this purpose... or do bandwidth constraints make this unreasonable? I imagine that our content is relatively static so that might make this possible.'' --JustinLeitgeb\r |
9 | * We don't have a human administration set-up where everyone with an admin job:\r |
10 | * Feels compensated in proportion to the work he does\r |
11 | * Is accessible on a predictable schedule\r |
12 | * PHP scripts have a time limit. This created problems with Squirrel Mail:\r |
13 | * It is often impossible to attach large files or download large attachments.\r |
14 | * When Fyodor is running its backup, the system becomes slow. Sometimes folder listings don't display because the php script times out before the folder is read from the imapd.\r |
15 | * ''Can we correct this by "nicing" the backup process? Might be a quick fix.'' --JustinLeitgeb\r |
16 | * ''Already done, unfortunately.'' --AdamChlipala\r |
17 | * Downloads from www.hcoop.net/~username are not counted toward the user's bandwidth usage\r |
18 | * ''Actually, they are counted as much as any other web activity, though we don't have any formal idea of "bandwidth quota" ATM. Do you have any information to indicate otherwise?'' --AdamChlipala\r |