Import Debian changes 20180207-1
[hcoop/debian/mlton.git] / doc / guide / localhost / ConcurrentMLImplementation
CommitLineData
7f918cf1
CE
1<!DOCTYPE html>\r
2<html lang="en">\r
3<head>\r
4<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8">\r
5<meta name="generator" content="AsciiDoc 8.6.9">\r
6<title>ConcurrentMLImplementation</title>\r
7<link rel="stylesheet" href="./asciidoc.css" type="text/css">\r
8<link rel="stylesheet" href="./pygments.css" type="text/css">\r
9\r
10\r
11<script type="text/javascript" src="./asciidoc.js"></script>\r
12<script type="text/javascript">\r
13/*<![CDATA[*/\r
14asciidoc.install();\r
15/*]]>*/\r
16</script>\r
17<link rel="stylesheet" href="./mlton.css" type="text/css">\r
18</head>\r
19<body class="article">\r
20<div id="banner">\r
21<div id="banner-home">\r
22<a href="./Home">MLton 20180207</a>\r
23</div>\r
24</div>\r
25<div id="header">\r
26<h1>ConcurrentMLImplementation</h1>\r
27</div>\r
28<div id="content">\r
29<div id="preamble">\r
30<div class="sectionbody">\r
31<div class="paragraph"><p>Here are some notes on MLton&#8217;s implementation of <a href="ConcurrentML">ConcurrentML</a>.</p></div>\r
32<div class="paragraph"><p>Concurrent ML was originally implemented for SML/NJ. It was ported to\r
33MLton in the summer of 2004. The main difference between the\r
34implementations is that SML/NJ uses continuations to implement CML\r
35threads, while MLton uses its underlying <a href="MLtonThread">thread</a>\r
36package. Presently, MLton&#8217;s threads are a little more heavyweight\r
37than SML/NJ&#8217;s continuations, but it&#8217;s pretty clear that there is some\r
38fat there that could be trimmed.</p></div>\r
39<div class="paragraph"><p>The implementation of CML in SML/NJ is built upon the first-class\r
40continuations of the <span class="monospaced">SMLofNJ.Cont</span> module.</p></div>\r
41<div class="listingblock">\r
42<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">type</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cont</span><span class="w"></span>\r
43<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">callcc</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cont</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"></span>\r
44<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">isolate</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cont</span><span class="w"></span>\r
45<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">throw</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cont</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;b</span><span class="w"></span>\r
46</pre></div></div></div>\r
47<div class="paragraph"><p>The implementation of CML in MLton is built upon the first-class\r
48threads of the <a href="MLtonThread">MLtonThread</a> module.</p></div>\r
49<div class="listingblock">\r
50<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">type</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"></span>\r
51<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">new</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"></span>\r
52<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">prepare</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">*</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Runnable</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"></span>\r
53<span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">switch</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Runnable</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"></span>\r
54</pre></div></div></div>\r
55<div class="paragraph"><p>The port is relatively straightforward, because CML always throws to a\r
56continuation at most once. Hence, an "abstract" implementation of\r
57CML could be built upon first-class one-shot continuations, which map\r
58equally well to SML/NJ&#8217;s continuations and MLton&#8217;s threads.</p></div>\r
59<div class="paragraph"><p>The "essence" of the port is to transform:</p></div>\r
60<div class="listingblock">\r
61<div class="content monospaced">\r
62<pre>callcc (fn k =&gt; ... throw k' v')</pre>\r
63</div></div>\r
64<div class="paragraph"><p>to</p></div>\r
65<div class="listingblock">\r
66<div class="content monospaced">\r
67<pre>switch (fn t =&gt; ... prepare (t', v'))</pre>\r
68</div></div>\r
69<div class="paragraph"><p>which suffices for the vast majority of the CML implementation.</p></div>\r
70<div class="paragraph"><p>There was only one complicated transformation: blocking multiple base\r
71events. In SML/NJ CML, the representation of base events is given by:</p></div>\r
72<div class="listingblock">\r
73<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">datatype</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">event_status</span><span class="w"></span>\r
74<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">ENABLED</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="n">prio</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">int</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">doFn</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="p">}</span><span class="w"></span>\r
75<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">BLOCKED</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="w"></span>\r
76<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">trans_id</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">ref</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
77<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
78<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">next</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"></span>\r
79<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">}</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"></span>\r
80<span class="k">type</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">base_evt</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">event_status</span><span class="w"></span>\r
81</pre></div></div></div>\r
82<div class="paragraph"><p>When synchronizing on a set of base events, which are all blocked, we\r
83must invoke each <span class="monospaced">BLOCKED</span> function with the same <span class="monospaced">transId</span> and\r
84<span class="monospaced">cleanUp</span> (the <span class="monospaced">transId</span> is (checked and) set to <span class="monospaced">CANCEL</span> by the\r
85<span class="monospaced">cleanUp</span> function, which is invoked by the first enabled event; this\r
86"fizzles" every other event in the synchronization group that later\r
87becomes enabled). However, each <span class="monospaced">BLOCKED</span> function is implemented by\r
88a callcc, so that when the event is enabled, it throws back to the\r
89point of synchronization. Hence, the next function (which doesn&#8217;t\r
90return) is invoked by the <span class="monospaced">BLOCKED</span> function to escape the callcc and\r
91continue in the thread performing the synchronization. In SML/NJ this\r
92is implemented as follows:</p></div>\r
93<div class="listingblock">\r
94<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">ext</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">([],</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">callcc</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">k</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">let</span><span class="w"></span>\r
95<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">throw</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">throw</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">k</span><span class="w"></span>\r
96<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">setFlg</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">mkFlg</span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
97<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">[]</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">atomicDispatch</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
98<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">blockFn::</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">r</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
99<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">throw</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">blockFn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="w"></span>\r
100<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
101<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">setFlg</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
102<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">next</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">r</span><span class="w"></span>\r
103<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">})</span><span class="w"></span>\r
104<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">in</span><span class="w"></span>\r
105<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="p">;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">error</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="s">&quot;[log]&quot;</span><span class="w"></span>\r
106<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">end</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
107</pre></div></div></div>\r
108<div class="paragraph"><p>(Note that <span class="monospaced">S.atomicDispatch</span> invokes the continuation of the next\r
109continuation on the ready queue.) This doesn&#8217;t map well to the MLton\r
110thread model. Although it follows the</p></div>\r
111<div class="listingblock">\r
112<div class="content monospaced">\r
113<pre>callcc (fn k =&gt; ... throw k v)</pre>\r
114</div></div>\r
115<div class="paragraph"><p>model, the fact that <span class="monospaced">blockFn</span> will also attempt to do</p></div>\r
116<div class="listingblock">\r
117<div class="content monospaced">\r
118<pre>callcc (fn k' =&gt; ... next ())</pre>\r
119</div></div>\r
120<div class="paragraph"><p>means that the naive transformation will result in nested <span class="monospaced">switch</span>-es.</p></div>\r
121<div class="paragraph"><p>We need to think a little more about what this code is trying to do.\r
122Essentially, each <span class="monospaced">blockFn</span> wants to capture this continuation, hold\r
123on to it until the event is enabled, and continue with next; when the\r
124event is enabled, before invoking the continuation and returning to\r
125the synchronization point, the <span class="monospaced">cleanUp</span> and other event specific\r
126operations are performed.</p></div>\r
127<div class="paragraph"><p>To accomplish the same effect in the MLton thread implementation, we\r
128have the following:</p></div>\r
129<div class="listingblock">\r
130<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">datatype</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">status</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
131<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">ENABLED</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="n">prio</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">int</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">doitFn</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="p">}</span><span class="w"></span>\r
132<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">BLOCKED</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">trans_id</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
133<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
134<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">next</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">rdy_thread</span><span class="p">}</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"></span>\r
135\r
136<span class="k">type</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">base</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">status</span><span class="w"></span>\r
137\r
138<span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">ext</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">([],</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="p">):</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
139<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">atomicSwitch</span><span class="w"></span>\r
140<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">thread</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"></span>\r
141<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">let</span><span class="w"></span>\r
142<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">TransID</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">mkFlg</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
143<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">rdy_thread</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
144<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">case</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"></span>\r
145<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">[]</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">next</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
146<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFn::blockFns</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"></span>\r
147<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">prep</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">o</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">new</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
148<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">_</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"></span>\r
149<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">let</span><span class="w"></span>\r
150<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">atomicBegin</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
151<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">x</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">{</span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">transId</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
152<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">cleanUp</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"></span>\r
153<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">next</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="p">}</span><span class="w"></span>\r
154<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">in</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">switch</span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">_</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">S</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">prepVal</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">x</span><span class="p">))</span><span class="w"></span>\r
155<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">end</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
156<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">in</span><span class="w"></span>\r
157<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">log</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">blockFns</span><span class="w"></span>\r
158<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">end</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
159</pre></div></div></div>\r
160<div class="paragraph"><p>To avoid the nested <span class="monospaced">switch</span>-es, I run the <span class="monospaced">blockFn</span> in it&#8217;s own\r
161thread, whose only purpose is to return to the synchronization point.\r
162This corresponds to the <span class="monospaced">throw (blockFn {...})</span> in the SML/NJ\r
163implementation. I&#8217;m worried that this implementation might be a\r
164little expensive, starting a new thread for each blocked event (when\r
165there are only multiple blocked events in a synchronization group).\r
166But, I don&#8217;t see another way of implementing this behavior in the\r
167MLton thread model.</p></div>\r
168<div class="paragraph"><p>Note that another way of thinking about what is going on is to\r
169consider each <span class="monospaced">blockFn</span> as prepending a different set of actions to\r
170the thread <span class="monospaced">t</span>. It might be possible to give a\r
171<span class="monospaced">MLton.Thread.unsafePrepend</span>.</p></div>\r
172<div class="listingblock">\r
173<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unsafePrepend</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">T</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">r</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">f</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;b</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="p">):</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;b</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
174<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">let</span><span class="w"></span>\r
175<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
176<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">case</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">!r</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">of</span><span class="w"></span>\r
177<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Dead</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">raise</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Fail</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="s">&quot;prepend to a Dead thread&quot;</span><span class="w"></span>\r
178<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">New</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">g</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">New</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">g</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">o</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">f</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
179<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">|</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Paused</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">g</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Paused</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">h</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">g</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">f</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">o</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">h</span><span class="p">),</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
180<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">in</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="cm">(* r := Dead; *)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
181<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">T</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">ref</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">)</span><span class="w"></span>\r
182<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">end</span><span class="w"></span>\r
183</pre></div></div></div>\r
184<div class="paragraph"><p>I have commented out the <span class="monospaced">r := Dead</span>, which would allow multiple\r
185prepends to the same thread (i.e., not destroying the original thread\r
186in the process). Of course, only one of the threads could be run: if\r
187the original thread were in the <span class="monospaced">Paused</span> state, then multiple threads\r
188would share the underlying runtime/primitive thread. Now, this\r
189matches the "one-shot" nature of CML continuations/threads, but I&#8217;m\r
190not comfortable with extending <span class="monospaced">MLton.Thread</span> with such an unsafe\r
191operation.</p></div>\r
192<div class="paragraph"><p>Other than this complication with blocking multiple base events, the\r
193port was quite routine. (As a very pleasant surprise, the CML\r
194implementation in SML/NJ doesn&#8217;t use any SML/NJ-isms.) There is a\r
195slight difference in the way in which critical sections are handled in\r
196SML/NJ and MLton; since <span class="monospaced">MLton.Thread.switch</span> <em>always</em> leaves a\r
197critical section, it is sometimes necessary to add additional\r
198<span class="monospaced">atomicBegin</span>-s/<span class="monospaced">atomicEnd</span>-s to ensure that we remain in a critical\r
199section after a thread switch.</p></div>\r
200<div class="paragraph"><p>While looking at virtually every file in the core CML implementation,\r
201I took the liberty of simplifying things where it seemed possible; in\r
202terms of style, the implementation is about half-way between Reppy&#8217;s\r
203original and MLton&#8217;s.</p></div>\r
204<div class="paragraph"><p>Some changes of note:</p></div>\r
205<div class="ulist"><ul>\r
206<li>\r
207<p>\r
208<span class="monospaced">util/</span> contains all pertinent data-structures: (functional and\r
209imperative) queues, (functional) priority queues. Hence, it should be\r
210easier to switch in more efficient or real-time implementations.\r
211</p>\r
212</li>\r
213<li>\r
214<p>\r
215<span class="monospaced">core-cml/scheduler.sml</span>: in both implementations, this is where\r
216most of the interesting action takes place. I&#8217;ve made the connection\r
217between <span class="monospaced">MLton.Thread.t</span>-s and <span class="monospaced">ThreadId.thread_id</span>-s more abstract\r
218than it is in the SML/NJ implementation, and encapsulated all of the\r
219<span class="monospaced">MLton.Thread</span> operations in this module.\r
220</p>\r
221</li>\r
222<li>\r
223<p>\r
224eliminated all of the "by hand" inlining\r
225</p>\r
226</li>\r
227</ul></div>\r
228</div>\r
229</div>\r
230<div class="sect1">\r
231<h2 id="_future_extensions">Future Extensions</h2>\r
232<div class="sectionbody">\r
233<div class="paragraph"><p>The CML documentation says the following:</p></div>\r
234<div class="quoteblock">\r
235<div class="content">\r
236<div class="listingblock">\r
237<div class="content monospaced">\r
238<pre>CML.joinEvt: thread_id -&gt; unit event</pre>\r
239</div></div>\r
240<div class="ulist"><ul>\r
241<li>\r
242<p>\r
243<span class="monospaced">joinEvt tid</span>\r
244</p>\r
245<div class="paragraph"><p>creates an event value for synchronizing on the termination of the\r
246thread with the ID tid. There are three ways that a thread may\r
247terminate: the function that was passed to spawn (or spawnc) may\r
248return; it may call the exit function, or it may have an uncaught\r
249exception. Note that <span class="monospaced">joinEvt</span> does not distinguish between these\r
250cases; it also does not become enabled if the named thread deadlocks\r
251(even if it is garbage collected).</p></div>\r
252</li>\r
253</ul></div>\r
254</div>\r
255<div class="attribution">\r
256</div></div>\r
257<div class="paragraph"><p>I believe that the <span class="monospaced">MLton.Finalizable</span> might be able to relax that\r
258last restriction. Upon the creation of a <span class="monospaced">'a Scheduler.thread</span>, we\r
259could attach a finalizer to the underlying <span class="monospaced">'a MLton.Thread.t</span> that\r
260enables the <span class="monospaced">joinEvt</span> (in the associated <span class="monospaced">ThreadID.thread_id</span>) when\r
261the <span class="monospaced">'a MLton.Thread.t</span> becomes unreachable.</p></div>\r
262<div class="paragraph"><p>I don&#8217;t know why CML doesn&#8217;t have</p></div>\r
263<div class="listingblock">\r
264<div class="content monospaced">\r
265<pre>CML.kill: thread_id -&gt; unit</pre>\r
266</div></div>\r
267<div class="paragraph"><p>which has a fairly simple implementation&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;setting a kill flag in the\r
268<span class="monospaced">thread_id</span> and adjusting the scheduler to discard any killed threads\r
269that it takes off the ready queue. The fairness of the scheduler\r
270ensures that a killed thread will eventually be discarded. The\r
271semantics are little murky for blocked threads that are killed,\r
272though. For example, consider a thread blocked on <span class="monospaced">SyncVar.mTake mv</span>\r
273and a thread blocked on <span class="monospaced">SyncVar.mGet mv</span>. If the first thread is\r
274killed while blocked, and a third thread does <span class="monospaced">SyncVar.mPut (mv, x)</span>,\r
275then we might expect that we&#8217;ll enable the second thread, and never\r
276the first. But, when only the ready queue is able to discard killed\r
277threads, then the <span class="monospaced">SyncVar.mPut</span> could enable the first thread\r
278(putting it on the ready queue, from which it will be discarded) and\r
279leave the second thread blocked. We could solve this by adjusting the\r
280<span class="monospaced">TransID.trans_id types</span> and the "cleaner" functions to look for both\r
281canceled transactions and transactions on killed threads.</p></div>\r
282<div class="paragraph"><p>John Reppy says that <a href="References#MarlowEtAl01">MarlowEtAl01</a> and <a href="References#FlattFindler04">FlattFindler04</a>\r
283explain why <span class="monospaced">CML.kill</span> would be a bad idea.</p></div>\r
284<div class="paragraph"><p>Between <span class="monospaced">CML.timeOutEvt</span> and <span class="monospaced">CML.kill</span>, one could give an efficient\r
285solution to the recent <span class="monospaced">comp.lang.ml</span> post about terminating a\r
286function that doesn&#8217;t complete in a given time.</p></div>\r
287<div class="listingblock">\r
288<div class="content"><div class="highlight"><pre><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fun</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">timeOut</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">f</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">unit</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">-&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">:</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">Time</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">time</span><span class="p">):</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">&#39;a</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">option</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"></span>\r
289<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">let</span><span class="w"></span>\r
290<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">iv</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">SyncVar</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">iVar</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"></span>\r
291<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">val</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">tid</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">spawn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">SyncVar</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">iPut</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">iv</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">f</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()))</span><span class="w"></span>\r
292<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">in</span><span class="w"></span>\r
293<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">select</span><span class="w"></span>\r
294<span class="w"> </span><span class="p">[</span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">wrap</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">timeOutEvt</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">t</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">()</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">kill</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">tid</span><span class="p">;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">NONE</span><span class="p">)),</span><span class="w"></span>\r
295<span class="w"> </span><span class="n">CML</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">wrap</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">(</span><span class="n">SyncVar</span><span class="p">.</span><span class="n">iGetEvt</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">iv</span><span class="p">,</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="k">fn</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">x</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="p">=&gt;</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">SOME</span><span class="w"> </span><span class="n">x</span><span class="p">)]</span><span class="w"></span>\r
296<span class="w"> </span><span class="k">end</span><span class="w"></span>\r
297</pre></div></div></div>\r
298</div>\r
299</div>\r
300<div class="sect1">\r
301<h2 id="_space_safety">Space Safety</h2>\r
302<div class="sectionbody">\r
303<div class="paragraph"><p>There are some CML related posts on the MLton mailing list:</p></div>\r
304<div class="ulist"><ul>\r
305<li>\r
306<p>\r
307<a href="http://www.mlton.org/pipermail/mlton/2004-May/">http://www.mlton.org/pipermail/mlton/2004-May/</a>\r
308</p>\r
309</li>\r
310</ul></div>\r
311<div class="paragraph"><p>that discuss concerns that SML/NJ&#8217;s implementation is not space\r
312efficient, because multi-shot continuations can be held indefinitely\r
313on event queues. MLton is better off because of the one-shot nature&#8201;&#8212;&#8201;when an event enables a thread, all other copies of the thread\r
314waiting in other event queues get turned into dead threads (of zero\r
315size).</p></div>\r
316</div>\r
317</div>\r
318</div>\r
319<div id="footnotes"><hr></div>\r
320<div id="footer">\r
321<div id="footer-text">\r
322</div>\r
323<div id="footer-badges">\r
324</div>\r
325</div>\r
326</body>\r
327</html>\r