Revert last commit.

[bpt/emacs.git] / etc / THE-GNU-PROJECT

diff --git a/etc/THE-GNU-PROJECT b/etc/THE-GNU-PROJECT
index d089d76..f3d554e 100644 (file)
--- a/etc/THE-GNU-PROJECT
+++ b/etc/THE-GNU-PROJECT
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
    care whether these users had freedom, only that they should be
    numerous.
 
-   This lead to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of
+   This led to a paradoxical situation where two different ways of
    counting the amount of freedom gave different answers to the question,
    "Is this program free?" If you judged based on the freedom provided by
    the distribution terms of the MIT release, you would say that X was
@@ -762,7 +762,7 @@
    Those of us who value free software for freedom's sake will stay with
    free software anyway. We will manage to get work done without the
    patented features. But those who value free software because they
-   expect it to be techically superior are likely to call it a failure
+   expect it to be technically superior are likely to call it a failure
    when a patent holds it back. Thus, while it is useful to talk about the
    practical effectiveness of the "cathedral" model of development (1),
    and the reliability and power of some free software, we must not stop