GUILE_PROC(scm_call_with_dynamic_root, "call-with-dynamic-root", 2, 0, 0,
(SCM thunk, SCM handler),
-"")
+"Evaluate @var{(thunk)} in a new dynamic context, returning its value.
+
+If an error occurs during evaluation, apply @var{handler} to the
+arguments to the throw, just as @code{throw} would. If this happens,
+@var{handler} is called outside the scope of the new root -- it is
+called in the same dynamic context in which
+@code{call-with-dynamic-root} was evaluated.
+
+If @var{thunk} captures a continuation, the continuation is rooted at
+the call to @var{thunk}. In particular, the call to
+@code{call-with-dynamic-root} is not captured. Therefore,
+@code{call-with-dynamic-root} always returns at most one time.
+
+Before calling @var{thunk}, the dynamic-wind chain is un-wound back to
+the root and a new chain started for @var{thunk}. Therefore, this call
+may not do what you expect:
+
+@example
+;; Almost certainly a bug:
+(with-output-to-port
+ some-port
+
+ (lambda ()
+ (call-with-dynamic-root
+ (lambda ()
+ (display 'fnord)
+ (newline))
+ (lambda (errcode) errcode))))
+@end example
+
+The problem is, on what port will @samp{fnord\n} be displayed? You
+might expect that because of the @code{with-output-to-port} that
+it will be displayed on the port bound to @code{some-port}. But it
+probably won't -- before evaluating the thunk, dynamic winds are
+unwound, including those created by @code{with-output-to-port}.
+So, the standard output port will have been re-set to its default value
+before @code{display} is evaluated.
+
+(This function was added to Guile mostly to help calls to functions in C
+libraries that can not tolerate non-local exits or calls that return
+multiple times. If such functions call back to the interpreter, it should
+be under a new dynamic root.)")
#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_call_with_dynamic_root
{
SCM_STACKITEM stack_place;
GUILE_PROC(scm_dynamic_root, "dynamic-root", 0, 0, 0,
(),
-"")
+"Return an object representing the current dynamic root.
+
+These objects are only useful for comparison using @code{eq?}.
+They are currently represented as numbers, but your code should
+in no way depend on this.")
#define FUNC_NAME s_scm_dynamic_root
{
return scm_ulong2num (SCM_SEQ (scm_root->rootcont));