From d7fcbbfe4a6f310814b45ee1a0aa7ccb458f0eb1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Eggert Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2012 00:29:04 -0800 Subject: [PATCH] Omit -Wstrict-overflow as it does not play well with --enable-checking. --- ChangeLog | 6 +++--- configure.ac | 7 ++++--- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/ChangeLog b/ChangeLog index 6852069087..cd31e95472 100644 --- a/ChangeLog +++ b/ChangeLog @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ -2012-11-19 Paul Eggert +2012-11-20 Paul Eggert Improve static checking of integer overflow and stack smashing. - * configure.ac (WARN_CFLAGS): Add -Wstack-protector and - -Wstrict-overflow if using GCC 4.7.2 or later on a platform with + * configure.ac (WARN_CFLAGS): Add -Wstack-protector + if using GCC 4.7.2 or later on a platform with at least 64-bit long int. This improves static checking on these platforms, when configured with --enable-gcc-warnings. diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac index 2a079cad26..01fe72d1ee 100644 --- a/configure.ac +++ b/configure.ac @@ -710,6 +710,8 @@ else nw="$nw -Wfloat-equal" # warns about high-quality code nw="$nw -Winline" # OK to ignore 'inline' nw="$nw -Wjump-misses-init" # We sometimes safely jump over init. + nw="$nw -Wstrict-overflow" # OK to optimize assuming that + # signed overflow has undefined behavior nw="$nw -Wsync-nand" # irrelevant here, and provokes ObjC warning nw="$nw -Wunsafe-loop-optimizations" # OK to suppress unsafe optimizations @@ -720,7 +722,7 @@ else # The following line should be removable at some point. nw="$nw -Wsuggest-attribute=pure" - AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to use -Wstack-protector -Wstrict-overflow]) + AC_MSG_CHECKING([whether to use -Wstack-protector]) AC_PREPROC_IFELSE( [AC_LANG_PROGRAM( [[#if (1 <= __LONG_MAX__ >> 31 >> 31 \ @@ -732,8 +734,7 @@ else ]])], [AC_MSG_RESULT(yes)], [AC_MSG_RESULT(no) - nw="$nw -Wstack-protector" - nw="$nw -Wstrict-overflow"]) + nw="$nw -Wstack-protector"]) gl_MANYWARN_ALL_GCC([ws]) gl_MANYWARN_COMPLEMENT([ws], [$ws], [$nw]) -- 2.20.1