X-Git-Url: http://git.hcoop.net/bpt/emacs.git/blobdiff_plain/b35f288d478ef137a4d9e8e5a6a5f368a86b01f5..acaf905b1130aae80fa59d2c861ffd4c8eb75486:/lisp/repeat.el diff --git a/lisp/repeat.el b/lisp/repeat.el index 3ca855913f..94efc717be 100644 --- a/lisp/repeat.el +++ b/lisp/repeat.el @@ -1,11 +1,10 @@ ;;; repeat.el --- convenient way to repeat the previous command -;; Copyright (C) 1998, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, -;; 2006, 2007, 2008 Free Software Foundation, Inc. +;; Copyright (C) 1998, 2001-2012 Free Software Foundation, Inc. ;; Author: Will Mengarini ;; Created: Mo 02 Mar 98 -;; Version: 0.51, We 13 May 98 +;; Version: 0.51 ;; Keywords: convenience, vi, repeat ;; This file is part of GNU Emacs. @@ -27,7 +26,7 @@ ;; Sometimes the fastest way to get something done is just to lean on a key; ;; moving forward through a series of words by leaning on M-f is an example. -;; But 'forward-page is orthodoxily bound to C-x ], so moving forward through +;; But 'forward-page is orthodoxly bound to C-x ], so moving forward through ;; several pages requires ;; Loop until desired page is reached: ;; Hold down control key with left pinkie. @@ -100,9 +99,9 @@ :type '(repeat function)) ;; If the last command was self-insert-command, the char to be inserted was -;; obtained by that command from last-command-char, which has now been +;; obtained by that command from last-command-event, which has now been ;; clobbered by the command sequence that invoked `repeat'. We could get it -;; from (recent-keys) & set last-command-char to that, "unclobbering" it, but +;; from (recent-keys) & set last-command-event to that, "unclobbering" it, but ;; this has the disadvantage that if the user types a sequence of different ;; chars then invokes repeat, only the final char will be inserted. In vi, ;; the dot command can reinsert the entire most-recently-inserted sequence. @@ -124,7 +123,9 @@ if `repeat' is bound to C-x z, typing C-x z z z repeats the previous command only occurs if the final character by which `repeat' was invoked is a member of that sequence. If this variable is nil, no re-execution occurs." :group 'convenience - :type 'boolean) + :type '(choice (const :tag "Repeat for all keys" t) + (const :tag "Don't repeat" nil) + (sexp :tag "Repeat for specific keys"))) ;;;;; ****************** HACKS TO THE REST OF EMACS ******************* ;;;;; @@ -247,14 +248,14 @@ recently executed command not bound to an input event\"." (setq repeat-arg last-prefix-arg)) ;; Now determine whether to loop on repeated taps of the final character ;; of the key sequence that invoked repeat. The Emacs global - ;; last-command-char contains the final character now, but may not still + ;; last-command-event contains the final character now, but may not still ;; contain it after the previous command is repeated, so the character ;; needs to be saved. (let ((repeat-repeat-char (if (eq repeat-on-final-keystroke t) - last-command-char + last-command-event ;; allow only specified final keystrokes - (car (memq last-command-char + (car (memq last-command-event (listify-key-sequence repeat-on-final-keystroke)))))) (if (memq last-repeatable-command '(exit-minibuffer @@ -335,7 +336,12 @@ recently executed command not bound to an input event\"." (setq real-last-command 'repeat) (setq repeat-undo-count 1) (unwind-protect - (while (eq (read-event) repeat-repeat-char) + (while (let ((evt (read-key))) + ;; For clicks, we need to strip the meta-data to + ;; check the underlying event name. + (eq (or (car-safe evt) evt) + (or (car-safe repeat-repeat-char) + repeat-repeat-char))) (repeat repeat-arg)) ;; Make sure `repeat-undo-count' is reset. (setq repeat-undo-count nil)) @@ -344,7 +350,7 @@ recently executed command not bound to an input event\"." (defun repeat-self-insert (string) (let ((i 0)) (while (< i (length string)) - (let ((last-command-char (aref string i))) + (let ((last-command-event (aref string i))) (self-insert-command 1)) (setq i (1+ i))))) @@ -357,7 +363,7 @@ recently executed command not bound to an input event\"." ;; OK, there's one situation left where that doesn't work correctly: when the ;; most recent self-insertion provoked an auto-fill. The problem is that -;; unravelling the undo information after an auto-fill is too hard, since all +;; unraveling the undo information after an auto-fill is too hard, since all ;; kinds of stuff can get in there as a result of comment prefixes etc. It'd ;; be possible to advise do-auto-fill to record the most recent ;; self-insertion before it does its thing, but that's a performance hit on @@ -387,5 +393,4 @@ recently executed command not bound to an input event\"." (provide 'repeat) -;; arch-tag: cd569600-a1ad-4fa7-9062-bb91dfeaf1db ;;; repeat.el ends here